Home » Tavolieri: ‘Agreement reached with Club Brugge’ – Jashari now set to join AC Milan
Ardon Jashari #30 of Club Brugge KV

Tavolieri: ‘Agreement reached with Club Brugge’ – Jashari now set to join AC Milan

Photo by Alex Bierens de Haan/Getty Images

Ardon Jashari to AC Milan is a done deal and he will finally arrive from Club Brugge, at least according to one reliable journalist.

The Jashari saga has dragged on for weeks and weeks now, with Milan finding Brugge a very tough nut to crack yet again. Despite multiple bids and improved offers financially, the Belgian club stood firm and even – as per some sources – moved the goalposts regarding their asking price.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


In recent days there has also been talk of the Rossoneri actually turning away from the Swiss international and focusing on an alternative name, like Valencia’s Javi Guerra. Now, however, the decisive breakthrough may have come.

Jashari to Milan: Agreement reached

Now, Sacha Tavolieri of Sky Switzerland has given the following update: “EXCLUSIVE: Ardon Jashari set to become AC Milan player! Agreement REACHED with Club Brugge. Now it’s only about fixing the payment terms. Five-year contract.”

While waiting for other sources to verify, it must be noted that one journalist did state today that Milan are trying to propose to Brugge to pay for Jashari over fewer years in terms of instalments (four instead of five). If the deal quickly goes through, that might have been what did it.

Tags AC Milan Ardon Jashari

113 Comments

  1. damn, never thought this would actually end in our favor… although still think we got robbed, hope Jashari doesn’t succumb to pressure and shows us what he’s made of!

    Forza Jardon!

    Could we actually sign a proper RB now?!

    Vlahovic is, imo, just a mater of time… Zebra Merda just has to accept the 10-15M offer…

    1. Lowkey, Tomiyasu sounds not half bad… he will be out of September and will need couple of weeks to re-adjust but from November on we can have an RB for free…

  2. Ok, jashari might now soon become a milan player ….. but the joy, the excitement, the anticipation, the enthusiasm of getting a promising new player have been completely ruined and lost by the strategy milan management adopts for these transfers. It is completely demeaning for a club with milan’s roll of honours, tradition and style.

    1. Only for you buddy. Most fans don’t care as long as it got done. But I understand there are those on here that just have to complain about everything this management does, so have it .
      I’m happy we now have a much stronger midfield than we did last season.

      1. You are somewhat correct that people complain a lot but one thing you have to agree, it took very long…time also matters…if this deal could have been done earlier then Jashari would have got more gelling time with the tteam.

  3. We will see. I’m not getting my hopes up. Glad if it is done. And what of those two RBs we were linked with signing in Spain and Switzerland (apparently wanting both)?

    We will see.

  4. Its always dangerous to count one’s chickens before they are hatched but I’ll at least hope for the best so this farce of a transfer saga can come to an abrupt end as everyone and me included is sick of it at this point of time.

    1. Jashari will be a great addition, but the best transfer of the summer in seria A by a distance is Ricci, the guy will be our best player for a number of years, he is the reason for Allegri confidence

      1. I’m definitely also happy about the Ricci deal as I have been calling for us to get him since his days in Empoli. When that is said he is probably more ready now but he has always been a talented player.

  5. Whilst this is good we have our new tonali let’s not forget the numbers. We bought tonali for €25m and are paying €38m for the new version. We sold tonali for €63m so they are the same numbers but we’ve missed out on tonali for 2 years (albeit 1 with his ban) and our Italian, homegrown hero who would bleed for the shirt. I know I’m going over old ground and we gotta move on but just wanted to highlight something. Don’t let these clowns fool you and forget the sh!t they put us through and the narrative they try and push

      1. Just qualifying for UCL is with €18.62.

        So pretty Sure you are off by several orders of magnitude

        But let’s take this further. Assume Milan win all 9 League Phase games at €2.1m per match. That is another €18.9m

        I’ll be generous and say that is €40m. We are not yet to Tonali.

        Gate for a typical game is €3m (this is revenue but again I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt) so that is another €27m.

        We are at €67m still less than only Tonali which is largely agreed €70m.

        Under perfect conditions.

        Really man, check your facts. I get you are Sure, but confidence is not correctness.

          1. Erm … you mean this article

            “Going into detail about the UEFA prize money: €18.62m for participation; €2.1m for each victory in the league phase and €700k for a draw plus bonuses based on the position in the standings. They range from €275k for the 36th-placed team to around €10m for the first.”

            The one using the same numbers I am? (And that I got the numbers from?)

            At this point this is just fun. What is your next retort?

            I am Sure you will be wrong. I simply cannot discern if you are plain uninformed or just another troll stirring the pot.

            Did you ride the short bus to this forum?

        1. You do know how profit works though ? For tonali we might have gotten 60mil but we paid i think 20 for him so the profit is only 40 same again with tijji dont remember what we signed him for buy must have been around 20

    1. You skip the part where Milan sold a player who was banned for a season and used the money to buy Reijnders, Pulisic and RLC. 2 of the 3 were Milan best players last season. One of them was sold for 70 m, bonuses included.

      1. And after all that finished 8 and lost how much money due to that? You forgot to mention this. The stupid story that Milan couldn’t spend 50M without selling Tonali is just that, a stupid story.

        1. They finished 2nd after they sold Tonali. Remember that? They improved by 3 positions after they sold Tonali. From 5th to 2nd.
          They finished 8th last season because they didn’t sell the cancer in the locker room Theo hernandez last summer. Milan finished that low last season because of a bad atmosphere in the locker room, not because they sold a gambler. 2 years prior.
          They had a player sabotaging the team.

          1. They finished 2nd in 2023/24 thanks to a much weaker Napoli and Lazio but still around the same points from the scudetto winner, so nothing to write home about.
            But even if you want to argue that was an improvment, reminder that we spend 130M€ in 2023, while Tonali was sold for less than 70M€, so all of Pulišić, Reijnders (which were our ONLY 2 good players purchased since 2023) and Jović could still have been brought while keeping Tonali. Heck, we could also have brought Hjulmand, an actual defensive midfielder with them instead of that headless chicken from the US that we got.
            Even with Théo sabotaging last season, almost every other player was bad and both coaches didn’t help us. If you want to hold Théo accountable for his actions and performances, so you should do for every other player.
            Tonali was banned for a year and then came back and look how much Newcastle improved since he came back compared to the season prior.

          2. Yes, Theo Hernandez played 11 positions for Milan and was really bad. All the players you mentioned were on vacation and had nothing to do with it. 🤡

          3. C’mon man. Milan had bigger problems than Theo last season. The team never found that that magic 11 for a formation that gel together. There were some great moments, but they weren’t sustained. Simply put, the team never got going under the new coach. Tactically, the team was off and lost too many games to lower tier teams.

      2. Yeah true but they were hardly expensive. For a team who won the league and still qualified for the champions league and reached the semis of the champions league, do you not think we should think we could buy 3 players for 70m and keep tonali or is that expecting too much.

      3. Milan had a net spending of 61 mln that summer, so they could have bought Reijnders&Pulisic even without selling Tonali. To keep Tonali they just needed to not buy Chukwueze, Musah and Okafor, who were failed transfers who served for nothing and cost 57 mln.

    2. Keep the negativity flowing,man. Don’t let any good news pass without throwing some negativity on it. You guys are insufferable. That’s the way to do it here on Sempre. More Tonali nonsense.
      If this guy isn’t much better than Tonali I will be hugely disappointed. I know we are all suppose to pretend that Tonali was some amazing player for us, but he wasn’t. At his best he was very good , but most of the time he was bang average. Once Kessie left he was exposed along with some others. And hopefully Jashari isn’t a degenerate gambler either.

      1. Has anyone noticed we cleared FIFA financial oversight, and now we are in this Mercato for a 25m transfer (Ricci) and. 40m transfer (Jashari)?

        🤔

      2. Of course. Tonali was so bad he was bought by Newcastle in a record transfer. Spent a year banned and them returned to the first team like he wasn’t out for a year and played great in Premier League. Sad thing is you are not joking.

        1. Did I say Tonali was “so bad”? When you have to start off your argument by making up what the other person said, you don’t have a very strong argument. Your definition of “great” must be different than mine. I would never use that to describe Tonali.
          And I love how all of you gloss over the fact that he was suspended for a year for gambling on games, as if that is not a big deal.
          Let’s imagine now that Milan didn’t sell him then, and didn’t use that money to buy either Pulisic, Reijnders or RLC (RLC had 10 goals that season for us).
          Then We lose Tonali for the year and our midfield is what? An injured Bennacer, Pobega and Krunic…
          Instead of finishing 2nd we probably get relegated. Then how would you have felt about your darling Tonali. Tonali didn’t give a F about the club to do what he did.

  6. Wait, the offer was over 5 years? To pay not even 7M per season? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😳😳😳😳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Ac Milan.

    1. I do not understand the laughs, this is how it works many times. We often do not see it, but the payments are often distributed over long period of time, its completely normal.

      1. It is ridiculous. Find one serious business doing that. In football it is possible but it should be used just if you will spend much more than you can and this is the only way. And one season or 2, not forever. What is the point of that? To cheat the spending rule? Great

        1. Facebook leases it’s hardware spreading out the cost over time just like that.

          Avis finances it’s cars at a favorable rate so it has a larger fleet.

          But yeah Sure what you said.

          1. Depends on the structure of the lease.

            In general because it is for cars (physical good with depreciation) it hits the books as capex. Same has a player in this situation.

            In general any chance to spread capex spend across time is a good thing. It leaves more cash on hand for opportunities.

            Finance 201.

            Please stop 💩 on a good day for the club.

          2. Yes, it is a loan. It can become a purchase. Loan with option to buy. Or depending on the structure of the lease a loan with obligation to buy. Stop being ridiculous, it is exactly what I said.

          3. “Yes, it is a loan. It can become a purchase. Loan with option to buy. Or depending on the structure of the lease a loan with obligation to buy. Stop being ridiculous, it is exactly what I said.”

            Wow, first you tell MK they said a thing they didn’t. That is called “reasoning from a false premise”.

            Now you are saying I said the same thing as you while you use the term “loan” and “lease” interchangeably in the context of finance.

            It is clear you must be recently out of primary school and as yet unable to realize there are entire parts of the world you know nothing about.

            You are not a troll. You are just a kid who thinks he knows it all when really you only know everything you know. When you understand one of those is a proper subset of the other and one is infinitesimally smaller than the other it will be worth the time to read your screes.

      2. @ Samuel, These trolls just want to complain. They were complaining that Milan weren’t going to sign him, Now that they are going to sign him, they have to find another reason, and it’s the method of payment. LOL . It exposes them as just angry little trolls who want to vent. Especially Sure, but he has deeper problems than that.

    2. Juventus is paying a mere €4.6m for 3 years to get Kalulu, that is an astute business strategy here.

      I’ve been a long advocate for us to adopt such strategy, finally.

      This means we pay less now, therefore having more money to fix the ream.

      You need to understand business.

      1. It is a strategy that should maybe be applied short term when you need to SPEND MORE. And then tou should pay as much as possible upfront. You pay a lower fee +clubs are much more happy to deal wirh you. If you just keep this up you have less money next year. And even less the season after. And so on. United has 400M transfer debt. I’m sure you run a successful business and you understand things…

          1. Finance gurus who have headed big corporations and have a track record to show for it are strategically adopting a simple but complex strategy, and you who has never managed a roadside Kiosk is here giving a myopic opinion.

            And by the way, this isn’t the economics you teach your pupils in “primary” school. This is Financial Management.

            In 2024, Manchester United generated a revenue of about €800m. You need to understand business financing, that way you will know that not all business debt are bad.
            Man United has the capacity to earn double to triple of it’s debt profile, such debt doesn’t weigh the club down.
            It’s debt is not a bank loan, it doesn’t attract interests, it is a mere instalmental obligation which the club would always carry out every transfer season.

            You ignorantly say Man Utd is in debt, but they have spent over €150m in this transfer window and they haven’t sold anyone… payment in instalments is the magic. Plus if they decide to offset all their obligations today, all they need to do is set aside one and a half season transfer fund to clear up all obligations.

            You may not understand, but it’s ok.
            I had written an epistle on this subject in this blog, I don’t really like to repeat myself over again. Just try to educate yourself, it helps.

            Thanks

          2. Are you Sure? I mean really sure.

            Econ on primary school is simplified for the youngsters who are yet to have a concept of money and how it works

            Econ in the world of adults making millions € deals for billions € clubs works differently.

            A primer for you (pun intended) it’s all about three things – profit, cash flow and cash on hand. Without all three in the black there is real risk of bankruptcy.

            Since we are conducting class for gifted primary school students who are Sure of their intellect, I invite you to reflect on which of those parameters such a payment structure positively impacts? Which negatively?

            I recommend Chat GPT with the prompt, “why would a company choose to pay for something expensive in installments rather than outright if they have the funds available”. Have fun, learn stuff.

          3. Yes, they have almost 400M transfer debt. I wrote exactly that, not bank loan or anything. So basically you say it was better for them to leave this debt and have the Glazers suck that money out of the club into their private accounts? Because that is what happened. That is the reality. If they didn’t they could have paid all thee fees upfront and save about 50M on fees.

          4. Omg this one is asking Chatstupidity and then pasting here. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I’ll refrain from really replying . We will all follow you, you must be a genius.

          5. @ACM1899

            No, I have some exec experience and have had to work with finance folks (M&A and cost cutting). It was not easy to learn how to make decisions in their world as I am more operations focused. It was immensely valuable tho. So the response was my own.

            I work with GPT all the time these days to help clients. Rather than providing links I often provide prompts then coach them on discerning what is actionable and what needs to go to source.

          6. @acm1899

            Hit post by mistake I suppose.

            If you have an interest in this stuff, check out an old novel called The Goal (Goldratt). It’s a story about how to run a business. About 1/2 way in they move from operational to impact on finance and accounting.

            That is the source for “profit, cash and cash flow …”

            If you are not in biz leadership I’d not recommend as the story likely wouldn’t resonate. All the conflict is centered on “old ways” v “new ways” and the ways wouldn’t matter.

        1. That’s a sporting question.
          We are discussing purely financial aspects here, or maybe “Primary School Economics” according to the wise one in here.

          But I do understand your question isn’t rhetorical.

    3. You will laugh even harder when you find out that majority of transfers in football are paid in installments. Rarely they are paid in 1 shot.

        1. Hello guru,

          Chelsea paid for Enzo Fernandez in six instalments.
          Roma just recently signed Soule and paid in four instalments.

          They all do not understand “Economics”.

          1. Roma did €26m in 4 instalments, how does this affect the club negatively?

            From Real Madrid to Liverpool to Man City, they all pay in instalments, I really don’t understand your fuss.

          1. About what? Paying 32M over 5 years? Even 4 is ridiculous. You’re a mo*on, of course you think I need to backpedal, I am 100% positive you do this 5+ times a day. When you realise you should listen to smart people. Enjoy doing that, suits you perfectly.

          2. Lmao getting to admit that guy was wrong was getting Trump to admit he was best buds with Epstein. Not happening lol

          3. Wrong about what? My comment was about Milan paying that small fee in 5 instalments and now you idiots want to project something so you can be right once? Ok, you can have it. We can pretend I said something else. If you want to talk about the instalments transfers in general, there are some clubs that rarely do it. Must be idiots, like Madrid, City, Liverpool and so on. You and mk sure know better. I suggest Chatstupidity to both of you. You will love it. Made for you.

          4. Sure uses ChatGPT to spam bomb this site. I doubt he even proofreads the AI diarrhea he posts.

            This site needs to give him the boot.

          5. Of course. If any “ai” stupidity bot read what I write it would blow up instantly. But you seem like one of the bots, did it hurt you “brain”? I’d ask about feelings but you’re a bot.

          6. But I completely get why you think it is a language model. You can’t comprehend that someone can write that much in their second language. You couldn’t in 3 lives. All good man, enjoy it.

          7. @Sure

            Wow busting out the LLM words along with your chatstupidity trope while working in your multi-lingual skillz.

            You are a real … erm … self pleaser aren’t you? It’s okay buddy, we all did it in sixth form too and nobody really go hair on their palms.

            Seriously, tell me you are a kid without telling you are under the age of 18.

            I’m gonna call your “Precious” from here on out. Bless your heart.

          8. “Sure uses ChatGPT to spam bomb this site. I doubt he even proofreads the AI diarrhea he posts.

            This site needs to give him the boot.”

            I’m 100% Sure that no one would object to that. No one would miss him/her.

  7. Finally the kind of technicality I have always wanted from Milan during negotiations.

    I am super pleased we used the instalmental payments system, perfect when we manage scarce funds.

    With this flexibility, we can sign more quality players within a short period of time.

    Impressive.

  8. Furlani is back from Asia…

    But as with Tonali and Fofana they have destroyed his pre-season preparations. Hopefully they will get him in great shape before playing him, not making the same mistake as with the former two, who both had mediocre first seasons.

  9. His willingness hunger and pushing to join us is overwhelming and I believe he will be better in our favour. All I know is that our midfield is stronger better than last season just a striker and a defender of 2 defenders one in the central and another in the right side but most especially a striker is needed a flexible striker who is decisive and great shooter then I will tell you Milan is back meanwhile watch out for Napoli

    1. Yeah I will say wait for Fabrizio to confirm as well. I think with Brugge it is best no one speaks because they are children and if it news gets out too early they think it is disrespect.

    1. Nope, this is different.

      When a certain legend left us, they said we are dead and wouldn’t be able to attract anyone, our star power was gone.

      But I’m surprised, first for Reijnders who now plays for Man City, then Ricci and now Jashari pushing so hard as a milan fan.

      These are the kind of players we need, players who are Milan fans for what Milan is, rather than sole allegiance to a particular player or legend.
      Milan today is Milan with or without your fave.

  10. holy s**t…. am I drunk or we did it?? Let’s go boys and girls, we got our prime target for the midfield and hopefully it works. Let’s see if we can complete the team and get back to Top4 or even scudetto if the team gels and Allegri proves doubters that he is an outdated coach. This does not let Redbird out of the hook but this transfer window surely looks like we finally mean business. Forza Milan!

  11. This is what Milan needs.

    His joining makes sure Milan won’t fall below 8, 9th places in the league, but also won’t boost too much.
    He is an important signing.

  12. Just a thought, but could it be he pushed because he felt he had a lot to learn from Modric? I mean, apart from the fact that he is a Milan fan.

    1. What would truly be priceless is getting an “ignore”-button on this site so everyone could block that whiny kid for good.

  13. Well, this escalated quickly 🤣🤣🤣 I was curious to read the comments hoping to see a support for the player, and it turned out to be a measuring d***s contest 😂😂😂

    1. Some kids (e.g. LOLOLOL-kid and “the artist formerly known as K”) here think they’re hung like a donkey but it turns out they only got an IQ of one. 🙂

  14. Paying in installments is common practice in football since ages. Don’t know why all the energy spent and needless arguments to prove differently.

    1. And especially when you manage to finance a 30-40M€ deal in so many installments that it makes even the so-called fans go crazy! They can’t handle how well Milan did here. 😀 😀 😀 😀

      Next they’ll get a 10M€ deal to be payable in 10 years? 😀

      1. Exactly, it’s a good deal being able to negotiate 30-40 million price to be paid in 4 or 5 installments. It let’s them spend more elsewhere (cannot believe I’m actually falling for this lmao).

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us