Devil’s Advocate: Four formations that Pioli could consider heading into the new season

By Oliver Fisher -

Preseason preparations get underway at Milanello tomorrow, and Stefano Pioli will no doubt be pondering a few different issues.

Of course it must be noted that the squad is not completely in place given that signing and sales will occur before the beginning of the season, but there is of course a chance that Pioli’s ideas have evolved and he may wish to keep things fresh tactically based on the personnel available.

With that being said, we have decided to take a look at four possible formations that the Rossoneri head coach could turn to in view of the 2021-22 campaign, which is one of the most important in recent years for the club given it will mark a return to the Champions League.

4-2-3-1

Sometimes the original is the best, and Pioli stuck by his trusty 4-2-3-1 system during the vast majority of the last campaign, settling on it after multiple experimentations and variations during the early part of his tenure.

Pros: The most obvious positive is that it is the formation that most of the players know and have grown accustomed to. It also accentuates to strengths of the team, which are the high defensive line, pressing style, the double pivot and having four forwards that can quickly commit to counter-attacks.

Cons: There were signs in the second half of the season that teams were beginning to work out how to stifle Pioli’s favoured approach, given the difficulty in breaking down the low block amid some bad results that put a top four finish in jeopardy. In addition, it forced Maldini and Massara to get an out-and-out No.10, of which there are not an abundance of quality options available on the market within Milan’s price range.

4-3-3

The 4-3-3 is a formation that Milanisti have become very familiar with over the past few years, with managers such as Vincenzo Montella and Gennaro Gattuso deciding to use it, but there is an argument the squad are better equipped to try it more so than ever.

Pros: It would keep the four-man defence, it could give Sandro Tonali the chance to settle in to his preferred Regista role, the hunt for a new attacking midfielder would not be so decisive and it could get the best out of players like Tommaso Pobega and others who do not have an obvious role in the 4-2-3-1.

From a tactical point of view it should also negate any chance of a midfield overload as was seen at certain times last season, such as in the home defeats to Atalanta and Inter plus the drubbing by Lazio. The back four in theory should have more protection, giving Theo Hernandez the license to bomb forward.

Photo LaPresse - Spada May 16 , 2021 Milan Italy Soccer A.C. Milan- Season 2020-2021 - Serie A Milan vs Cagliari In the pic Hakan CalhanogluAnte Rebic Theo Hernandez PUBLICATIONxNOTxINxITAxFRAxCHN Copyright: xSpada/LaPressex

Cons: It would remove Milan’s biggest strength under Pioli so far: the double pivot. It would also throw up questions marks about whether the team might be missing a No.10 playing close to Ibrahimovic (or another striker) and alternating positions with the winger, while Brahim Diaz for example would be left questioning his role.

Getting the balance of the midfield is also difficult. It could have a detrimental effect on Kessie and/or Bennacer, and signing a creative mezzala like Marcel Sabitzer, Dani Ceballos or Houssem Aouar means benching one of them if Tonali does play deeper, purely to have some attacking threat.

4-4-2/4-2-2-2

This formation became a bit of a comfort blanket for Pioli when he needed greater attacking threat, both in the 2019-20 season and at times last year, as it naturally creates a greater presence in the final third.

Pros: It seems to make Milan more dangerous and fluid going forward. With a target man and someone to run off him as the front two, the two creative players either side are given the license to either stay wide or find pockets of space around the edge of the box to bring numbers to the attack.

There is also some stability too, as the bedrock of the good things from last season – namely the two-man midfield, the full-back pairing and the centre-back partnership – are all kept, but not at the expensive of any real solidity down the middle.

Cons: Pioli would have to give up playing with a bonafide attacking midfielder, which is something that he has shown willingness to do in the past but only in glimpses. It could also potentially leave Kessie and Bennacer a bit more prone to exposure down the middle without the cover of a Calhanoglu-type player.

Then, there are some questions over the attacking department and who can adopt to what role. Would it be Rebic or Leao next to Ibrahimovic? Can one of them possibly adapt to playing as a left-sided attacking midfielder? Would it all of a sudden make strengthening the right side a huge priority?

3-5-2

This is perhaps the most bold of the four formations we will discuss, but we have already discussed in great detail via a tactical analysis why switching to a three-man defence could fix a lot of Milan’s deficiencies.

Pros: There is quite a big list of positives. Two up front to assist the press, numbers in the middle due to three midfielders, Theo able to function as a natural wing-back, a system that is more suited for zonal and man-to-man pressing and the opportunity to try Romagnoli-Kjaer-Tomori at the back.

Thinking of the midfield, it could allow Bennacer-Tonali-Kessie to thrive, while again players like Pobega or a more creative new signing could slot in there too. Calabria would be given license to get forward more too, and it is quickly adaptable to a 3-4-1-2 for extra attacking presence.

Cons: It is an overhaul from the current way of doing things and may disrupt the stability that Pioli had managed to instil. For example, while on paper playing with three centre-backs should help Romagnoli, it could be that he doesn’t adapt. The same can be said for any three of the current midfielders, and perhaps the far less veiled threat of the wing-backs would be easier neutralised.

There are also no wingers in such a formation, which begs a certain question about what the future would hold for Rebic, Leao, Jens Petter Hauge and Saelaemaekers on the right. Moreover, there is no natural No.10 – will Pioli be willing to give that up?

As a final point, it is worth noting that there is nothing to hint Pioli will indeed change formations ahead of the new season, but rather these are merely suggestions about different variations that – with a bit of work – could get a marginally better use out of the squad. A lot, we suspect, will depend on transfer business.


READ MORE: From an unknown quantity to undroppable – How Kjaer has been a catalyst for Milan’s revival

Tags AC Milan

11 Comments

  1. Zoro Caloro says:

    Pioli is an average coach at best, he won’t change anything even if it’s best for us. He has his system and even though some other formations would suit this roster better he won’t change it. Too scared and insecure. Guaranteed he stays 4231.

    1. Vero Rossonero says:

      Agreed, and it’s why I ultimately think that Pioli might not survive this season. Clearly, this roster should have been adapted to the 4-3-3. This would have meant not needing to bother to replace Calhanoglu and/or Diaz, which means saving money to get a good CF and RW. It would have meant a starting sport for Tonali alongside Bennacer and Kessie, and probably lots of playing time for Pobega. But as you say, Pioli has his system. If we’re outside the top 4 come January I think (hope) he will be out.

      1. Zoro Caloro says:

        433 is fine for sure but i think the 3412 or the 343 is best for us.

      2. Zoro Caloro says:

        I do like that our midfield would be solid with Tonali Kessie and Bennacer all playing. But we’d have to buy 2 midfielders then for backup bc Krunic is meh. Bakayoko, Pobega stays, and then maybe Schouten or try and bring back Cristante or go for Pellegrini. Such a shame we don’t have Cristante and Locatelli still. Our midfield would be excellent and deep. Instead we made a total of 20+ mil lol… now Loca alone is double that. And we just got rid of Olzer, so dumb… keep making mistakes Milan..

  2. kakouyou says:

    3412/343 would be taxing for the team, especially on the wide area. but, i think that’s a good idea.
    4141/451 or another variation of the current formation 4231 probably high on the coach consideration. 4321 look interesting too, with hauge/diaz and anothe AM behind striker.
    there is a lot to try, but we all know pioli would never change his approach to the game. he look like someone who dislike changes.

  3. Sila says:

    Where does that name Aouar come in? I don’t see how a 3412 could work? Who takes what position? 343 seems suicide. 532 could work. Bennacer or Tonali must be creative then and you can forget the wingers.
    I think 4231 is best right now. Maybe 433

  4. Joe101 says:

    Pioli will play whatever it is needed to build a team around Krunic and Samu
    he can’t wait to get fired so he can elope with them

    1. Zoro Caloro says:

      Correct, then he’ll call up Meite to his private room since he loves him so irrationally…

      1. Sila says:

        Why you write so stupid comments? And @sempremilan why don’t you delete them?

        1. Joe101 says:

          frustration towards the way our management is failing us
          also searching for any sort of reasonable explanation to why Pioli does what he does…so since none can be found, satire is required

          stupid endeavors generate stupid comments (speaking of my own here)

          1. Sila says:

            Okay I can tolerate that. Thanks!

Comments are closed

Serie A Standings

Live football scores . Current table, fixtures & results.