Home » Report: ‘A-level’ Endrick, Karetsas and Hutchinson – Milan’s search for an attacking midfielder concludes

Report: ‘A-level’ Endrick, Karetsas and Hutchinson – Milan’s search for an attacking midfielder concludes

This has been a big summer for AC Milan, but some feel that the club haven’t fully achieved what they had hoped with the lack of an ‘A-level’ midfielder.

Although more than €150 million has been spent by Milan, there are still a few question marks about the mercato. After all, the much-needed No.10 position has not yet been filled – or at least it hasn’t been until Omari Hutchinson officially joins the club.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


The No.10 targets

Speaking on his X account, @FootballKush was quizzed on the mercato for the No.10 position, mainly focusing on the right side.

Antonio Belloni, a journalist for MilanVibes, questioned why an ‘A-level’ player hadn’t been signed despite Ruben Amorim’s desire to add a player with this profile all summer. In fact, he named Konstantinos Karetsas as a player in this category.

Kush then replied that someone of the ‘A-Level’ was targeted, but not achieved. It wasn’t Karetsas, too, with the Greek only wanting Borussia Dortmund. When asked who that A-level target was, he confirmed that it was Endrick.

Real Madrid new signing, Endrick Felipe
Photo by Angel Martinez/Getty Images

Of course, given his strike rate this summer and the other reports, it is believable that this was the case.

The interesting part, though, is where he mentions Hutchinson: ‘Milan just couldn’t land that A-level player, but Hutchinson was also always part of their list from the beginning and now the loan gives them a chance to evaluate him’.

Tags AC Milan Endrick Konstantinos Karetsas Omari Hutchinson

21 Comments

  1. “This has been a big summer for AC Milan, but some feel that the club haven’t fully achieved what they had hoped with the lack of an ‘A-level’ midfielder.”

    SOME feel? Name me one person that honestly feels otherwise.
    We have signed three excellent players, there is no doubt about
    it, but, we need much more than that. A big summer? Not quite.

    1. Tell me, do you think AC Milan is an EPL club and can drop 300m randomly like Spurs Lolerpool do?

      When will you people get realistic about being an Italian club? If spending is so frustrating for you, you literally shouldnt be following an Italian club.

      1. if Roma and Juve can have -100 when they have direct threats from FFP; same can be said about us when we actually followed rules for 4-5 years…

        PSG spent big and now are getting fruits of their labor… you have to finish the squad once and not keep sabotaging ourselves. currently we are at -65M with Tomori, Fofana, Terracciano, RLC, Bondo, Estupinian needing to be sold. Fofana leaves most likely on simple loan, but 15+5+10+10+15 can be generated from other bozos; that’s +55M for those that can’t do math… meaning -10M

        we need 3 players to finish the squad: quality CB, LWB and CM/CDM (I think Rabiot has to be CAM this season, too good up field)

        Zalewski costs 20-25M, Scalvini/Yoro 40-50M and CM/CDM depends who we go for but even that can be loan+obligation to sweeten the deal. 70M would bring us to -80M; way below Roma and Juve spendings…

        1. Comparing a middle eastern backed club that misuses Ligue 1 rules to cook the books for FFP, are you insane?

          Juve and Roma has spent nowhere near what Milan has, you think they would be able to afford Ranks? Roma had to do split payments for Mora ffs

          Wtf are you comparing

        2. Please learn that a) that we can’t just sell players like in FIFA, we’ve been trying to for weeks but the best offers we get are loans AND b) how football accounting works for FFP/PSR calculations

          Also, we had to follow more stringent rules because we completely broke them and that was a deal the club agreed with UEFA. There’s every chance it will befall the others too.

          Roma are in the UCL this year. Also, look at what they’ve spent: 125M committed and, assuming they’re all on 5 year contracts, that’s 25M per season in those fees (plus the additional wages, but they were already paying Malen). They also didn’t spend some 20-30M paying off a load of their staff at the end of last year. Meanwhile, our salary bill is about 10% higher than theirs (due to higher revenues).

          I’m not going to do an in depth analysis on their annual squad cost and maybe it is higher than ours, but you’re pulling numbers out of the air and presenting them as fact.

        3. Please learn that a) that we can’t just sell players like in FIFA, we’ve been trying to for weeks but the best offers we get are loans AND b) how football accounting works for FFP/PSR calculations

          Also, we had to follow more stringent rules because we completely broke them and that was a deal the club agreed with UEFA. There’s every chance it will befall the others too.

          Roma are in the UCL this year. Also, look at what they’ve spent: 125M committed and, assuming they’re all on 5 year contracts, that’s 25M per season in those fees (plus the additional wages, but they were already paying Malen). They also didn’t spend some 20-30M paying off a load of their staff at the end of last year. Meanwhile, our salary bill is about 10% higher than theirs (due to higher revenues).

          I’m not going to do an in depth analysis on their annual squad cost and maybe it is higher than ours, but you’re pulling numbers out of the air and presenting them as fact.

        4. Exor “recapitalizes” Juventus every other year. If the Agnelli family wants to burn their cash like that, that’s on them, but most people/companies won’t.

          Then to your Roma allegation:

          *Roma transfers by season for the last 5 seasons:

          22/23 – Purchases 9.4M, sales 81.67M
          23/24 – Purchases 24.6M, sales 81.48M
          24/25 – Purchases 142.25m, Sales 29.35m
          25/26 – Purchases 89.60m, sales 65.15m
          26/27 – Purchases 124.50, sales 14.30m

          Total purchases: 390.35M, at an average of 78.07M per season
          Total sales of 271.94M, at an average of 54.39M

          Difference of 23.68M average transfer spending to average sales.

          *Milan transfers by season for the last 5 seasons:

          22/23 – Purchases 61.79m, Sales 11.11m
          23/24 – Purchases 132.68m, Sales 80.62m
          24/25 – 139.00m, 53.66m
          25/26 – 170.00m, 176.00m
          26/27 – 160.85m, €87.00m

          Total purchases 664.32m, average of 132.84m per season
          Total sales 408.39, average of 81.68 per season

          Difference of 51.16m average transfer spending to average sales.

          Milan spends 70% more than Roma overall, makes 50% that Roma does on sales overall, and spends 116% more of their average transfer income over average sales than Roma does. Do a little homework please.

        5. *over the last 5 years.

          Also, why the f- do you keep insisting on Scalvini? He’s missed 77 matches over the last 4 campaigns due to injury, for 35.6% missed matched. Do players not get injured in EAFC? Good god.

      2. Who said anything about some enormous and pharaonic spending?
        It’s really not your place to make such suggestments and give such advices just because we don’t see eye to eye and probably (tend to) look at things from somewhat different perspectives, you have no right to do that, it’s an oversimplification and it’s reductive.

    2. What if instead of churned 40% of the team in a summer we got three pieces. Had a good season and built from there.

      We then hold an option in Jan of adding on key piece based on data and direct observation in the intended system rather than opinion.

      1. 40% of the team would be cca 15 players, I have never asked for that many players to be signed (not even replaced). Why is it OK for you to wait until January/February? I don’t want us to waste another season, isn’t it obvious that we lack at least three (but rather four) good players in respective positions? CCB, *RWB, DMC (I really want to see what the plan is here in case of, God forbid, Musah’s injury, not to mention that he isn’t a defensive midfielder in a conventional sense and meaning of the word but someone who needs to be moulded into that profile), AMRC, SC (vice-Ramos)?

    3. “Name some that feel otherwise”

      Me. I think they have brought in good options and sold the right people, especially Leao. This may end up a scudetto season.

      1. I said honestly, but OK, if that really is what you think, I respect that but you are being overly optimistic. We are still in need of at least three or four more signings.

  2. I think it’s a must to sign a central CB for how Amorim wants to play.

    Having said that, we will fight for 4th place in the league if everything goes well. That is my opinion; I hope I am wrong and we win everything. But when you see INTER/COMO/ROMA/JUVE, I think if we get 4th place, it won’t be a bad season. We keep the coach, then next year the club should buy two players with huge quality. Then we will try to win.

    Always and forever forza Milan…

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us