On the pitch and off it, AC Milan have several questions that need answering, and the longer-term worries are all to do with the management of the Rossoneri.
Players can and always be questioned about performances, after all, it is part and parcel of football. The game, is quite literally, about those on the field. However, they can be influenced by situations off it, and vice versa.
Off the field, the big issues lie with the management, the construction of it, the power of some members, and also the structure.
In his column, Zazzaroni lists 12 things for the club, after an opening statement, which can be seen below, thanks to Pianeta Milan.
“Still not having understood, after months and months, whose AC Milan really is, I have made up my mind. I, Ivan Zazzaroni, ask Giorgio Furlani and Gerry Cardinale 12 questions. Here’s the list:
➤ Who is the definitive owner of Milan, understood as the holder of control and decisions? And is it normal for professionals who are an expression of the selling party to remain in the top roles of a sold company?
➤ What is Ibrahimovic’s position? Is it shared and accepted by all parties?
➤ Don’t you think that, given the results, the fans deserve to know who will be responsible for the technical choices that will be made from now on?
➤ Has it ever crossed your mind that in the purge carried out in the recent past we went a little too far and threw the baby out with the bathwater?
➤ Do you not think that some officers have reached an excessive degree of influence, considering the calibre of the company?
➤ Have you ever wondered why none of you have been able to convince the media and fans of the key management points? Are we all stupid or is smoking particularly functional in cases like this?
➤ When Cardinale and Ibra met in London with agents and, above all, candidates for sports management – Berta, Tare, Paratici – were you aware of this?
Then, he asks some more ‘marginal’ questions.
➤ Who chose Lopetegui in the summer? And who decided to trounce him after the tifo/social protest?
➤ Who decided to entrust the team to Paulo Fonseca?
➤ Who didn’t have the sense to inform Fonseca himself that he had been sacked, forcing him to be beaten in a humiliating press conference?
➤ Why after one Portuguese came another and yet another (João Felix)?
➤ Is it true that he risked his job?
It is certainly a bold set of questions to place down, and there are questions on there that need to be answered. Unfortunately, if things are left to the imagination, it will only bode poorly for the Rossoneri, which does not help anyone.
🍿
We have a ‘management’?
🤣🤣🤣 best question
Lol ikr 🤣
Don’t bother. Americans usually destroy anything they touch. Especially abroad.
Be thankful it’s not the Brits?
Maybe people would prefer the Russian way?
You could literary restrict the questions to 2 or 3 before the house of cards come tumbling down if answered honestly. The main issue appears to be the hierarchy, who answers to who and how do you streamlinedl this. And 2nd what is the project and how best do you implement and manage that. Neither can be truthfully answered hence the chaos…
They claimed Maldini was power hungry and obsessed with vetoing decisions.
But even Maldini did not do up to all these. I wonder if the real power hungry ones were always there behind the scenes. Hmmm
Furlani and Moncada are Maldini backstabbers.
The good thing is now the fans and public can see who’s the one that can work and made Milan into champion and the other are clueless noob that put Milan at 9th place.
My question:
Why Furlani, Ibra, and Moncada didn’t get fired?
Maldini and Masara brought scudetto to Milan but Gerry the RedTurd fired both of them quickly like they’re garbage. Meanwhile Ibra, Furlani, and Moncada only brought bad results and they still here.
Why after one French came another and yet another (Bondo)