Home » Fiorentina 1-1 AC Milan: Five things we learned – poor aim and passive performances
five things we learned fiorentina 1-1 milan

Fiorentina 1-1 AC Milan: Five things we learned – poor aim and passive performances

AC Milan were once again held to a draw by a team at the bottom end of the end, and once again they needed a late goal to rescue it.

On Thursday night, Milan drew 1-1 with Genoa who were in 17th place before hand, with Rafael Leao’s 92nd-minute equaliser salvaging a point. This afternoon at the Stadio Artemio Franchi, it was Christopher Nkunku who scored late on against a side that are in 18th place.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


Milan created several clear-cut scoring opportunities in the first half but looked like being made to pay when Pietro Comuzzo’s header went in midway through the second half. They did at least get another 1-1 to keep the unbeaten run, but could fall five points behind Inter if they beat Napoli.

Could it be four days in which the hopes of an unlikely Scudetto push were finally put to bed? Time will tell, and Thursday’s tough trip to Como will be another litmus test. Below are Ivan Stoev‘s five talking points from the draw at the Franchi.

1. Shooting boots left at home

Milan dropped two points against Genoa due to their lack of creativity in attack and now against Fiorentina they dropped two more because of poor finishing. Christian Pulisic has been the hero many times, but he was the flop on Sunday as he could’ve easily scored at least a brace if not more.

The American had two big chances in the first half as he went face to face with Davide De Gea but squandered both of them. For the first one he rounded the Spaniard when shooting seemed easier, and that led him to snatch a bit at the second one which he hit straight at the goalkeeper.

We published an analysis of the ‘first shot phenomenon’ that Milan have benefitted from this season. Since then, naturally, they have missed big chances that have almost cost all three points. Fiorentina took the lead and Allegri’s men themselves in an awkward position towards the end of the game, when it could and should have been comfortable.

Pulisic and Leao are both quite clearly playing through the pain barrier a bit, but they are the decisive men. When they don’t fire the Milan attack is not up for the challenge and with tougher fixtures to come it will be crucial for the coach to tweak things and find a solution.

Pietro Comuzzo of ACF Fiorentina
Photo by Gabriele Maltinti/Getty Images

2. Positive by Der Panzer

Niclas Füllkrug had quite positive cameos off the bench against Cagliari and Genoa, showing that he could offer something different. Starting games is always very different though, with less space and less rhythm in the game.

The German got the nod and impressed again. He should have had two assists as his hold-up play got Pulisic two 1v1s against De Gea. This was just what Milan were missing – a focal point for the ball to stick to – but sadly for him and Allegri the American failed to take the chances.

In the second half the 32-year-old was quieter and later taken off – most likely because he isn’t close to 100% yet – but it was a positive game and the impact was there. He should already have multiple goal contributions, and now we need to see him become a goal threat too.

3. Rough waters

Rafael Leao came on in the second half with Milan needed to do more to force the issue. In the first 15 minutes or so after coming on the Portuguese barely touched the ball and he just seemed like he was hiding instead of trying to make things happen.

In contrast, Pulisic might have missed his chances, but he at least dropped deep and asked for the ball, while his movement is always smart as it drags defenders around. Leao was a ghost, static both when his team had the ball and when they needed to press.

In added time he also wasted a counter-attack that could’ve resulted in his team stealing all three points, yet he wasted the opportunity yet again. He may well still be under instruction not to accelerate quickly, but if this is the case there are other ways he can be useful, and the Genoa game showed.

Photo by Marco Luzzani/Getty Images

After the game, Allegri said something interesting to DAZN: “Leao isn’t feeling great yet; in the final minutes, he could have made more impact by taking a slightly more sidelined position to get into one-on-one situations. We’re getting all our players back, and I’m happy.”

Following games in which he had scored, the coach praised Leao for trying to get into dangerous areas (the box). In this case though he wanted him wider, i.e. more towards his ‘original’ position on the wing. Mixed messaging perhaps?

4. A chance not taken

Allegri rotated his squad given the game against Genoa was less than 70 hours prior. He opted to make changes in midfield, with Samuele Ricci and Ardon Jashari given an opportunity alongside Ruben Loftus-Cheek.

Fiorentina effectively played a three-man midfield with their 4-1-4-1, and they won the battle in the middle for large parts. Ricci and especially Jashari just never got fully into the game, with the latter being subbed off for Rabiot.

The chances Milan did manage to create came mainly from the forwards, because all three of the starting midfielders either couldn’t hold onto the ball or showed very little willingness to break the lines with penetrative passing.

In the second half it was a bit better after Adrien Rabiot came off the bench and even Youssouf Fofana added a bit more creativity to the midfield, as he got the assist on the equaliser. It’s evident that if both Modric and Rabiot are not on the pitch then the quality and presence drops a lot.

Jashari, Ricci, andf Loftus-Cheek
Photos by Marco Luzzani/Getty Images and Alessandro Sabatini/Getty Images

5. Constant lapses

Up to Fiorentina’s goal the host didn’t have big chances with most of their shots going straight at Maignan. Then, in the 66th minute the whole team again lost concentration as they have done on multiple occasions this season, resulting in lots of points dropped.

Davide Bartesaghi and Strahinja Pavlovic didn’t communicate well at all when the corner came in, and in the end it was a free header for Comuzzo at the near post. Given Milan often try this tactic themselves, they should have been able to prepare for it better.

What’s more frustrating is that this follows up the goal conceded against Genoa where Matteo Gabbia lost concentration and allowed Lorenzo Colombo to beat him in a situation where he should be in front of the striker.

Even with three centre-backs and a three-man midfield to protect them, Milan are continuing to concede goals in most games, no matter the level of opponent. There is no safety in numbers, so it begs the question, what is really needed to keep clean sheets consistently?

Tags AC Milan Fiorentina-Milan

42 Comments

  1. We learned that we have only 2 GOOD midfielders: Rabiot & Modrić. Jashari has the injury excuse, the clock is ticking. The others didn’t play together long enough to develop chemistry, don’t have the skillset for the role they’re asked to perform and are simply bang average.
    We learned that even playing only one competition, a player like Saelemakers needs to be rotated from time to time, as overuse and fatigue is leading to sloppy performances.
    What we “learned” also is that Allegri doesn’t learn or pretends to not learn. We’ve been figured out and he’s still pretending that everything is fine. I’m not asking him to drop his entire style of boring dull games and winning by the minimum margin, but if he doesn’t tweak stuff from time to time, if he doesn’t understand that what is working is no longer working, he won’t win more games. The only justification for this style, or the only justification of ANY style is winning, if we don’t win, then something has to be fixed, period. And we failed to win 2 consecutive games against tomato cans.

      1. Ricci has shown with Torino he’s more than capable of succeeding in the league. But he’s barely been played and had no chance to develop any chemistry with the others. Same with Jashari as far as playing time. If those two can actually get some decent gametime they’ll be good

        1. Ricci HAS TO be braver. It looks like he’s afraid to pass the ball forwards. It’s always horizontal passes to the player next to him without ever trying to advance the play.

    1. Rightio the second placed team needs 4 new midfielders.

      At least we’re in the January transfer window.

      Maybe 3 new defenders, 4 new midfielders, and a striker. Not asking for much!

      1. And then there’s the one guy who keeps insisting that a team should NEVER EVER upgrade their players because all transfers are evil and destroy the game. We should have kept Krunic, Zlatan, Giroud and probably Mexes & Zapata too.

      2. I don’t know what type of substance you’re enhaling to convince yourself ALL of our players are good, but I might ask who your dealer is sometimes.

  2. Two strange games from Pulisic in a row now – first against Genoa he takes the ball into the net waving his arms about, and then tonight messes up 3 golden opportunities…

    Fullkrug… Not my first choice at all but his link up play is okay. But I thought we brought him in because he’s built like a tree and can muscle us a few goals in the box… jury’s out on that imo..

    Overall with the defensive c0ck ups occurring like clockwork again, disappointing midfield reserves, sussed out 352, Leao looking lost up front, etc I think we should just be grateful iNTeR vs Crapoli ended 2-2…

    Off topic: Calamity Thiaw’s at it again in Newcastle – caused first goal, then gave away a penalty with a handball, then got yanked at half-time… ouch. Pity we let that dude go….

    1. Leao doesn’t have the technical skill in tight spaces. His strength is the breakaway speed. With Fullkrug I feel like Allegri needs to revert back to a 433 because Der Panzer is decent at hold up even he’s not at 100% yet and can put both Puki and Leao into scoring positions as we saw today.

      1. Or a 3-4-3 with Bartesaghi and Saelemakers as wingbacks and Rabiot+Modrić in the midfield, thus sidestepping the issue with Fofana/Loftus-Cheek.
        I don’t dislike the 4-3-3 but I don’t Saelemakers as a good rightback.
        But I don’t see neither happening.
        To think we could have been first by now, but instead we’re letting the scudetto slipping away.

        1. To play 343 and still be compact defensively, Pulisic and Leao will have to run more, cover more ground and make up for the loss of the midfielder.
          If you take a midfielder out for a forward Milan will get worse defensively and you will get the Milan of last season.
          Fofana is clumsy and error prone but he covers a lot of ground, he is physical and gets involved in duels. If you take a midfielder out you are left with Rabiot and 40 years old Modric in front of the defense. Thats a recipe for a disaster because Modric will have to run even more.
          Instead of taking a midfielder out Milan should sign a midfielder who will be an upgrade skill wise over Fofana but still be able to cover Fofana’s defensive duties.

        2. 343 is another better option at this point (which Allegri will ignore) – der Baumstamm up front or Nkunku dropping in as the false 9 if he keeps this form up…

  3. What we learnt is that Pulisic is a fluke, and only score goals like “been at the place at the right time”
    Or try to steal a tap in that was goal bound already and ended up using his hand or get lucky sometimes.
    And there is no point bringing Leao to the mix anytime the team fails
    We also learnt that Jashari, Ricci and RLC ain’t better that Fofana

    1. OLUMIGHTY YOU ARE THE FLUKE and just don t understand the game. Again today we saw your LAZY LAZY LEAO under perform again . Pulisic is the most creative player on the team and at least he tries to attack the low block. MOST RELIABLE PLAYER FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS. STICK IT OLU

    2. I don’t want to make this about Leao, but since you’re on a campaign against Pulisic for one bad game in favor of Leao, here are some statistics:

      Pulisic: 84 total appearances in Serie A, 31 goals. That’s .37 goals per appearance. 5,899 minutes played, 190 minutes per goal. 22 assists, so .27 assists per appearance.

      Leao: 211 total appearances in Serie A, 62 goals, .29 goals per appearance. 14,083 minutes played, 227 minutes per goal. 48 assists for .23 assists per appearance.

      Source: Transfermarkt

      Pulisic is literally better in every metric. Also, uh “only score goals like been at the place at the right time”. You must be 12, because one of the greatest strikers of all time scored plenty of goals like this. Or do you think Filippo Inzaghi is trash too? Maybe you didn’t see him play. And Pulisic isn’t even a striker. Pray to Olu that you check your facts before talking.

  4. With 433 we will be exposed just like before, look when alegri switch to 433 tonight, fio giot many chances in counter

  5. “Following games in which he had scored, the coach praised Leao for trying to get into dangerous areas (the box). In this case though he wanted him wider, i.e. more towards his ‘original’ position on the wing. Mixed messaging perhaps?”

    You do understand that depending on what position you play you are asked to play in a certain way.
    When Leao is played as a striker he needs to be more central and in the box.
    When Leao is played as a winger, like today, especially when Nkunku got into the game, then he has to play wider.
    It is that simple.
    Where is the mixed messaging?

  6. SIMPLY LEAO NEEDS MORE ROOM TO OPERATE ,HE IS NOT A STRIKER .. HE IS A WINGER. WHEN WILL THE COACH ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND THIS ???

    1. Of course he’s a winger. So is Pulisic. We’d be much better off in a 4-3-3. All Allegri has to do is take a central defender out and put in Fullkrug in between Leao and Pulisic. Then the midfield three remain the same (Rabiot-Modric-Fofana/Ricci), then a backline of Bartesaghi-Pavlovic-Gabbia/Tomori-Saelemaekers. This would also solve the depth issue at CB as we’d now have two experienced CBs in the bench. Gimenez would be the backup striker when he returns and we’ve got Nkunku to backup the wings. Salad could even play higher up if depth requires it, with Tomori playing as RB if Athemake isn’t up to it. Most problems solved. Allegri just won’t do it.

  7. Sell Ricci, Jashari and RLC, after selling Fofana. This is AC Milan. We are not bottom feeders. We demand the best. These four players should be playing for Genoa, not Milan.

  8. Estupinan disaster and it’s like downgrade from Theo position. Last couple seasons, left side was the key for Milan, either leao / Theo. It’s time to bring back leao to the left winger. He will explode !

    My analysis, I think Milan players too tired , minimum strikers option + minimum squad. In the middle, RLC doing nothing + no special with Ricci. Low standard. Milan need player like modric / even maybe bennacer. They can set up play.

    1. “It’s time to bring back leao to the left winger. He will explode !”

      I think you meant “His hamstrings will explode!”. He’s miles from being fit. Making him run will only make him completely unavailable for a longer period. He should be rested instead until he’s actually in a shape playing football requires him to be.

  9. Starting with completely new set of midfielder make me 50% sure we would either lose or draw, missing those 2 golden chance increase it to 70% and Fiorentina scoring made it 100%.

    1. Well said. But I’d also give credit to starting both RLC AND Perv.

      It was like begging for a beating to put them both on the pitch.

  10. I am leaving this page. This is not a fan site.
    The wording in articles and comments has nothing to do with emotions, fandom, critisism, positive or negative. It’s just harsh toxic wording.

      1. You defended it well when you started supporting Como last season. Everyone else is a fake fan but you. You’re the only true fan here. 🙂

        1. Fans support the team and the team is the players.

          So when you slag off the players you’re slagging off the team.

          Hope that helps.

          1. And you should never ever slag off a team that finnishes 8th in Serie A when they’re used to winning trophies and competing in UCL. Am I right?

            We should just send them (the players) money and tell them we still love them and ask EU to ban all transfer windows so we can keep the players that won us the scudetto half a decade ago. 🙄

          2. Sorry but a guy switching teams and bragging about it has no business talking about true fans.
            You have exposed yourself and still talk in a condesceding way acting you’re the only one who knows something. Your lack of self awarness never fails to amaze me.

  11. In general it was a terrible performance albeit it would’ve been a comfortable win had Pulisic scored his 1v1s.

    It’s the bottom half curse again.

    And love how the author talks about “tougher games”. Unless he’s referring to the next Cremonese again these players have shown they have more than enough to beat Inter!

    It’s sickening to think of the points lost to the bottom teams.

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us