Home » Romano: ‘Here we go’ – Milan agree €35m deal with Chelsea for Nkunku
Nkunku here we go

Romano: ‘Here we go’ – Milan agree €35m deal with Chelsea for Nkunku

This morning, AC Milan have agreed a deal with Chelsea to sign Christopher Nkunku, according to Fabrizio Romano. 

There have been several ideas for Milan this summer, but the latest could be the last, with things progressing quite quickly in the past 24 hours. Yesterday afternoon, it seemed like Dusan Vlahovic could be the man to arrive.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


However, the Serbian has been overshadowed again. This time, by Chelsea’s out-of-favour Frenchman Nkunku. Last night, things advanced rather quickly, and this has continued through to this morning.

Nkunku: Done deal

Now, Fabrizio Romano has given the deal the ‘here we go’ stamp, stating that a deal has been ‘verbally agreed’ between the clubs. The documents are set to be prepared today, and the Rossoneri will pay €35 million plus bonuses.

Buda Mendes/Getty Images

Additionally, the Frenchman will sign a five-year deal with the club, which was agreed upon yesterday.

With RB Leipzig, Nkunku was fantastic, scoring 36 times in his final two seasons at the club, and this will be the player that the Rossoneri hope to bring to San Siro. With that said, he has failed to score more than three a year in the Premier League. It is certainly a risk, but it could pay off massively.

Tags AC Milan Christopher Nkunku

85 Comments

      1. At least he is somehow proven. Everyone who comments defending Gimenez never knew of that guys before he came here. A terrible panic buy god enough for Dutch or Belgian league, The problem with Nkunku is that he is a shadow of his former self before the injury but any ok EPL player succeeds in Serie A.

  1. This could still be a plan B prepared in case Vlahovic doesn’t come within the next day or two.

    Hope we can get Akanji.

    Gimenez is no Ibrahimovic or Giroud who can play as a target. Neither is Nkunku so I guess the only target player rumoured is Dovbyk.
    Will we switch Gimenez for Dovbyk and then get Vlahovic as well?

    1. Allegri should go now before it’s too late, Pedulla is 100% correct.
      Juve sacked this man because his tactics were terrible
      and dull for this modern game.
      Stay tune for the next game fellas Milan is in trouble!
      What is so surprising is that Capello and Sacchi gave approval to Milan hiring this man called Allegri?

  2. Wow, 6 goals in 2 seasons, that is perfect for what we need, just perfect, and signing a 5 year deal, nice……
    Just wow, It just couldn’t get any better

    1. Chelsea my friend, do you actually just look at the numbers and make a conclusion? Have you ever seen him play, do you understand the dynamic

    2. next 30m for 29yo Christensen (another exChelsea) & Nkunku is not ST, he play in Leao post, we already have clue who will be on selling list next season,
      we still don’t have real ST while “not good enough” Giroud & Aubameyang scoring for fun out there

    3. He had a major injury and they have 40 first team players. Keep in mind people were posting praises when Gimenez came and no one heard of that guy before. Nkunku is proven in a more advanced league than Serie A. I absolutely don’t understand Vlahovic hype. No top team wants him as he essentially is a more knows version of Gimenez.

  3. Probably the replacement of Okafor/Chukky.

    Now to the central defender and the striker. Both Christensen and Akanji are viable options imo.

        1. That’s exactly the point. Too expensive for just a rotation player. Where we can add that 35 mil to get our top list in striker dept.

          1. He’s starting as rotation but could end up taking a spot in starting lineup. If we play 4231 he could play with pulisic and Leao. And either dovbyk or Gimenez in front.

          2. Yes, I said it also in the other article. This move only makes some sense if we revert bac to our classic 4231. But it means that all the Allegri work in the pre season will get back to square one. Which is far from ideal.

  4. Make I just dey watch how this season go be first I just don’t want to sound pessimistic.panic buy and sakes that’s all I can see

  5. 70 mil between Gimenez and Nkunku and Milan still doesn’t have a striker, but apparently Vlahovic is too expensive.
    Good luck to Nkunku.
    He is, or was, a very good player at Leipzig. If he can go back to that form it will help Milan, but i don’t think he is a profile of a player that is what Milan needs right now, especially for that kind of money.
    Joao Felix type of signing but on a permanent basis. Let’s hope that it works.
    Unless they sign a true n9 by Monday, it looks like they are planning to roll with Leao as a striker.

      1. He is a much much, much better player than Okafor.
        If Okafor didn’t put Kalulu on his a$$ in the UCL, today no one will know who Okafor is.
        Nkunku was one of the best players in the Bundesliga for a few years.

  6. 35M for this guy? Tare time to pack your bags already. What a loser. And to imagine some people labeled him as a magician for selling Thiaw. LOL

    1. That is actually tranfermarkt’s evaluation. So he didn’t overpay. The question is what is the reason to bring him in? Is Santi going out?

  7. If I remember correctly, we wanted Nkunku before he went to Chelsea for 3x the figure on what we planned to propose. He was a flop there, but it won’t be the first time we use Chelsea as a tool to bring player’s valuation down to earth. At this point, we saw more talent coming from the blues than from our own academy…

    1. A very good point about letting Chelsea bring the player’s valuation down. Players who flop at one club are not necessarily flops everywhere. Especially when the player is a forward and the club is Chelsea. Liverpool, Bayern, Man City, and now Milan have reaped huge rewards from former Chelsea “flops.”

        1. Right, I didn’t say they necessarily won’t flop here. I said they’re not necessarily flops when they leave Chelsea. That’s why the valuation goes down. Because Milan accepts some risk when buying the player for 20M — instead of 60M+ if he was a standout in the PL. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.

          1. Yes but this guy was injured more than Boniface. If he failed his medical there is a big possibility Nkunku will as well.

          2. You were right.. Kezman, Crespo, Pato, Shevchenko etc, all flop at Chelsea. these doesn’t actually mean they’re bad player or Flop in the previous clubs.

        2. RLC is not a star, no question there, unless you are Allegri – then you can push for the club to pay 50M for him. But he is also not a flop in my opinion. He was a 20M transfer and is a good option for the bench and even as a starter vs certain teams. So I won’t say he is a flop.

          Tomori, though not cheap, was crucial part of our defense in his first couple of seasons, and even though I find myself more and more frustrated with his attitude in the last couple of years, he is still sadly the most reliable in Defense (looking awkwardly at Gabbia’s recent form dip).

      1. we’ve got lucky in Pulisic & Giroud, how about T. Bakayoko, RLC, Tomori, Abraham & Felix?
        Moncada should work for Chelsea & we need to sign Atalanta’s scouts.

  8. Nkunku is 177cm, We need ST loke Giroud who can hold the ball, heading the ball, eat leao low cross, for that size we had pulisic gimenez, nkunku just another okafor,

    1. Like Z wrote, Allegri might convert Leao as a striker. That’s the only thing that makes sense with this transfer

      1. If that’s the plan, I believe he will fail successfully. This works out well only for fast vertical passes in counter attacks. But he can still be a winger and stay in front of everyone else for those occasions. Otherwise he is not a good finisher – I hope (but I doubt) this will change and he has actively tried to not play headers up until this summer (even though he has the physical attributes for it).

  9. Not really sure about this move. Way too risky. Way too expensive. Hoped that it’s loan with option to buy, but no. And not really the profile we need. I was optimistic at the early of the mercato as we looked more targeted and calculated.

    But after this striker fiasco, we’re back to square one again.

  10. Does anybody, and I include management have the slightest idea of what system we will play this season?

    Assuming we are trying to build a squad for a system?

    If we end up with 433 Nkunku could be an upgrade on Okafor/Chucky for the wings.

    I’m just baffled as to what is happening. I assume we will bring in a striker?

  11. This surely means Allegri will stick with 352 and Leao-Pulišić up front. Gimenez-Nkunku a backup. Or something, idk anymore.

    This mercato went from an 8 with buying Modric, Ricci and Jashari to a 7 with Estupinan and Athekame, De Winter and now 6 with the likes of Nkunku and lack of proper planing before selling.

      1. It is obvious there never was a real plan but a really flimsy one. Seems like the plan was to hope that Juventus release Vlahovic and pay him 6M so Milan can pay his sign on fee and his salary.

  12. If Allegri isn’t on board on any of these arrivals he should just flip his middle finger to the management and call it quits and step down. Personally I wouldn’t blame him one bit if that is the case.

    1. He seemed desperate to get back to management in a top club so I think it will happen in a few months. He’ll try and then begin flaming the whole management like Conte usually did. We’ll see when the window ends, but if there are no proper signings in these few days I expect the press conferences to get really interesting if things don’t go well.

      1. Yeah maybe we are in for a meltdown 2.0, full strip this time around 😀
        Kidding aside I’ve been an AC Milan fan for 36 years and never had I thought I would ever say that I would refuse to work at the club I love if I was a professional player. In fact I would have killed for that opportunity previously.

        1. We’ll see. Hard to predict when our transfer window consisted of a 2 month drama to get one player from Belgium for 40M€ (I think we paid double from what he is worth) and now this panic in the last 5-6 days, to get the players we should have gotten in July. There were so many opportunities and now you get leftovers to pick from.

          1. I probably should have written considering refusing but yeah time will tell. Jashari might come good and I do think we paid a bit above his value but probably not twice the value. Overall the Mercato seemed to start out well at least with the Ricci deal but as things stands right now it seems we are just trying to skimp through at random targets..

  13. I wonder if a future deal for Leao was discussed to lower the price. Chelsea wanted 50 mil. Let´s hope a real striker still arives because Nkunku is basically back-up for Leao. A better back-up than Okafor. If we add a striker things look better than before. At the moment only the Dovbyk route seems to be alive.

  14. Tare Refused to sign this Old,Injury Pronr,Expenssive
    But Furlani is Destroyer plus the Reactionary mind of Algeri who is internally hate milan.
    Curiosità: Christopher #Nkunku ha saltato 76 gare ufficiali negli ultimi 3 anni per infortunio tra #Lipsia e #Chelsea: nello stesso lasso di tempo il “rottame” Victor #Boniface ne ha saltate “solo” 37…

    1. Omg, it is nonsense. Tare refused? In that case Tare is a loser, I’ve never seen a bigger loser in football. He should quit if he is doing nothing.

  15. Isn’t he a CAM? Like I said in the other article, does this mean we’re changing setup, with a game already played in the league. Giampaolo 2.0 but in reverse re formation

  16. Lets us allow Tare to do his job. We criticise too much. Yes, i will love to get Vlahovic but if not, life must continue. Welcome Nkunku. Hope you bring us joy.

  17. Great player if he rediscovers his Leipzig days, he was unplayable during that time. If he hits off in Italy he will be even better than Pulisic. My main concern is he coming because Allegri wants him or is tare/Moncada buying hoping he fits the system? That’s the biggest concern. As a player his very good.

    1. More likely is Tare has his head in his hands in is considering his position. This has the three stooges written all over it.

    2. Coach is there to work with what he has available as resources. If the players bought fit his system, he needs to make it work and be a bit more fluid based on their strengths and weaknesses. It’s not a FIFA game where you are the manager and everything is decided by you alone. Tomorrow you can leave and the club has to be able to continue easily with another coach with different style of play and different requirements.

      To be fair, we have a decent enough squad as individual qualities to challenge for or be close behind the title contenders. It’s his job to make an organized team out of those individuals and for this year at least finish in top 4. No matter if Vlahovic, RLC, Fofana or Rabiot are in the team or not – he has to make it work.

  18. This makes a lot of sense -Power, speed, technique ,hes got it all – Lets keep our fingers crossed for injuries

  19. So we turned down Boniface because of he is prone to injuries and instead turned to Nkunku despite him being prone to injury and not actually a striker ?

  20. Furlani sees footballers as stocks.

    Nkunku’s candle is red so snap him up and ‘if’ he works out theres profit to be had. If he doesn’t work out, as long as he’s not a disaster for a couple of years we should at least break even after amortisation. Pure market speculation.

    This has nothing to do with what the football staff and the fans want.

  21. With that amount of money, couldn’t we have signed kean instead?

    We bring tare and allegri before june but yet again this mercato nothing seems to be planned.
    Even with the formation, from 4-2-3-1 to 4-3-3 now we suddenly want to play 3-5-2 which the signings don’t make sense at all for 3-5-2.

    Leao is still the best player in this squad, he thrives at LWF in 3 man forward so i don’t know why allegri want to experiment or in this case sacrifice Leao.

    If Allegri knew he wanted to play with 3-5-2 they might as well sell leao and pulisic instead of forcing them to play as strikers.

    Looking at the squad 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 would make much more sense with depth in every position except maybe for fullbacks.

  22. Even with Boniface 2 ACL is still better than this waste of funds. We should have taken the risk of signing Boniface for just one year, after which we can renew if he stays injured.

    Okafor is better than this guy.

  23. What a weird, weird choice. A guy with no place at Chelsea, no obvious tactical fit in our lineup and a horrendous recent injury history but, instead of angling for a loan, we’ve gone in with a huge bid (by our standards).

    Worth saying that this confounds everything we thought of about the board too – they’ve been quick and decisive to get it done… but why this one?

    It would seem to confirm 3-5-2 as the primary formation going forward too.

  24. Even with Boniface 2 ACL is still better than this waste of funds. We should have taken the risk of signing Boniface for just one year, after which we can renew if he stays injury free.

    Okafor is better than this guy.

  25. Nkunku is a fantastic player. With okafor and possibly chukwueze leaving he’s a great replacement for them. Miles better and if he regains form he’s just as good as pulisic. My only question is what formation are we planning here? We still need a target man? If vlahovic is deemed impossible then go for arokodore.

  26. WOW!!! Not understanding this management at all!! Either i am old school an not understanding todays game or this management is clueless!!!

  27. Hoping Nkunku ends up playing well for Milan after his, let’s say quite underwhelming Chelsea stint, sounds like wishful thinking to me.
    Should’ve been a loan with an option to buy.

  28. Why do we always buy prayers who failed to play at there own club?Ac Milan must be serious Nkunku as failed at Chelsea he is not even worth to that amount they are asking for to me the answer is a big NO time is still there seach and buy good players not those failure’s

  29. Well if you look at his “name value” then some will say this is a great signing (and he could be) – BUT – he has A LOT to prove as he hasn’t done much since leaving Leipzig and couldn’t get a starting spot w Chelsea.

    BUT again – when you wait till the last minute of the window to address your needs, you are left with limited choices.

    Also what position is he playing? Second striker? CAM, RW? Interesting signing with a lot of question marks.

    He seems like a BOOM or BUST type of signing. Again ANOTHER GAMBLE and 42M isn’t cheap considering his performance the last few seasons.

    Hate to remind that dip$h*t Furlani but we finished 8th last year – not 2nd. So many gambles….

    This one should be interesting. Let’s pray we get the Leipzig player and not the Chelsea one…

  30. Wow. Just wow…. Complete opposite profile of what Tare said they were looking for in the beginning of summer…

    The only way this signing makes sense is if Santi is on his way out, Nkunku replaces him and Milan additionally bring in a Vlahovic profile striker …

    Otherwise I don’t know how to process this.

  31. NKunku isn’t a 9…Maybe he’s Okafor’s replacement…well, he’s apparently on his way so. Hope he scores plenty of goals. Remember all….Pulisic came from the Chelsea wilderness as well. This is a strange move I must say.

  32. I hope for his success but seeing his stat this is very worrying, still regret that we’re not went all out for Osimhen and solved the striker issue in many years.

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us