Home » The art of positional rotation: How Amorim can harness Pavlovic as an attacking wild card
ruben amorim pavlovic

The art of positional rotation: How Amorim can harness Pavlovic as an attacking wild card

Photos: AC Milan + Marco Luzzani/Getty Images

As surprising as it might sound given how impressive he was last season, there is a bit of mystery surrounding Strahinja Pavlovic.

The intrigue surrounding Pavlovic is not necessarily regarding his qualities, which were on display for the vast majority of last season. It is not about his future, with no talk of an imminent exit or even bids arriving from interested clubs.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


Instead, it centres around a key question: can the new head coach Ruben Amorim harness Pavlović’s greatest strengths without abandoning his own principles? For a reminder of what those are, check out our tactical analysis on the Portuguese.

The premise

We start from something that has already been established: Pavlović and Mario Gila are ball-playing centre-backs, but Pavlović’s ball-carrying doesn’t naturally fit Amorim’s Sporting system.

The be more specific, the Serbian often runs out from the back line with the ball (erratically on occasion) rather than passing through the lines. Yet, there’s a simple tactical tweak that could make it work.

We saw it many times under Massimiliano Allegri where Pavlovic would become almost an added forward, bombing on to try and not only get involved in attacks but even score, like against Roma in the 1-0 win at San Siro.

The issue is that Allegri facilitated and encouraged it. Amorim’s three-man defence diktat is a bit more rigid: he wants the central defenders to contribute to vertical movement of the ball, but not at the expense of leaving their position (potentially) wide open.

What do the numbers tell us?

Pavlović averages 0.53 successful dribbles per game (50% success rate), ranking in the 92nd percentile for completed dribbles per 90.

Gila averages 0.22 successful dribbles per game with an outstanding 85% success rate, ranking in the 65th percentile.

The contrast is clear: Pavlović was a high-volume ball carrier under Allegri, regularly looking to progress play by driving forward.

Gila, meanwhile, is a more selective dribbler: he carries the ball less often, but chooses his moments well, resulting in a much higher success rate.

milan centre-back comparison

Why encourage defenders to dribble?

In Serie A, where man-to-man marking is widely used, defenders on the ball often find every passing lane covered.

A well-timed ball carry can disrupt that structure, forcing an opponent to step out and break the marking chain, which in turn opens up new passing lanes and spaces elsewhere on the pitch.

A perfect example came against Milan, when Felipe recognised that every passing option had been shut off. Instead of forcing the pass, he carried the ball forward, broke the press and progressed possession himself.

How can Amorim make it work

So how can Amorim maximise Pavlović’s – and even Gila’s – ball-carrying ability without sacrificing his principles? The answer could be simple: positional rotations.

Amorim’s rest defence is built around a 3+2 structure to protect against counter-attacks.

Further ahead, Pulisic can drift wide to pin and drag the opposition full-back with him, opening up the left half-space.

Saelemaekers can then rotate inside alongside Rabiot to form the double pivot, maintaining numerical superiority in midfield while preserving Amorim’s 3+2 rest-defence structure.

These simple positional rotations could create the space needed for Pavlović to carry the ball forward without compromising Milan’s defensive balance.

Tags AC Milan Strahinja Pavlovic

15 Comments

  1. Nevermind Gabbia, Athekame, Ardon and Nkunku in the starting lineup?! Alexis on the left flank? NO.
    P.S. Pavlovic reminds me so much of Chielini…

    1. Amorim said himself that he was looking for using Alexis on LWB… your takes are getting worse and worse

      1. He’s also reportedly planning to bring Mazraoui and somehow I’m the problem here and not his crazy ideas?! Why would he move Alexis instead
        of leaving him there (and letting him play in his natural position) and bringing one LWB of real decent quality, name one good reason ? Wasn’t
        the general idea to have one attacking-minded
        and one defensive WB on the opposite flank?
        What is exactly the agenda here i.e. what is he trying to implement by bringing another right
        (and mostly full, mind you) back which wasn’t
        even that good (to put it mildly) at UTD under
        that same Amorim because he was used as a RWB?! If he’s, on the other hand, planning to
        utilise him as a right center-back, we already
        have Gila for that. My takes, listen to this guy, unbelievable…

        1. Alexis has played at LW/LB/LWB for both us, Bologna, Roma and Anderlecht. Even Pioli utilized him there when we had Diego Dalot stinking up the place as a makeshift replacement for Theo when he had injury trouble, Dalot was so bad we even had Junior Messias playing as a make shift RB on occasion.

          1. Dalot was bad Hahaha Get the hell out of here, man. Alexis has played as a LB for us, when exactly? JM RB, when was that?

        2. Gila will be playing in the middle of the defense. With Tomori on the transfer block, Milan needs a RCB

          1. Gila will play in the middle only if we don’t buy a (center) CB. Why else would there be so much talk about Inacio/Van Dijk/Stones etc? Why are we now letting Antonio Silva and Tiago Gabriel leaving for/to other clubs, did it ever occur to you that we have completed that department with Gila and De Winter? Tomori is still at ACM and we have Odogu as well, why would we buy another RDC? I’m happy to be proven wrong…

  2. There is litteral positional rotation in Amorin’s football. The 3-2-5 structure is quite rigid. Pavlovic is not the perfect fit and I would not be surprised if he leaves in case a 45-50m offers come, which would allow Amorin to get Inacio.

  3. In my view, the situation is different ,every player has to have a backup.
    The team must automatically counter and backup the whole in the game.
    1 you must to be fit
    2one team
    3 never give up

  4. Sorry, Pavlovic puts his head down and just drives without seeing any options. He’s a bigger version of Saelemaeker.

  5. I believe Amorim style (3-4-2-1 or 3-4-3) relies on a structured and secure build up to attacks from the back. The central defender’s direct forward runs without solid defensive cover are a tactical nightmare for Amorim because they disrupt the structural balance and leave vast spaces behind the lines that the opponent can exploit in quick transitions. Praising Pavlovic as an “attacking trump card” is a way of glossing over the flaws. An elite defender with a passing accuracy of 67.3% is a ticking time bomb in the back line. In a league like Serie A, this disastrous percentage of misplaced passes in the build up area translates to handing out free and direct scoring opportunities to opponents. His forward runs are not always tactical brilliance, sometimes they are reckless and haphazard, stemming from his inability to make calm, short passes under pressure. If Amorim fails to exploit this enormous physical and impulsive raw material and turn it into an organized tactical advantage (as Gasperini did with Atalanta defenders for years), this will represent a clear training failure in utilizing the individual characteristics of the players and forcing them into rigid tactical molds that do not suit them.

  6. That spider map is interesting. It shows Tomori winning the most possessions out of our defenders (for all the flack he gets). Gabbia and Pav have the best aerials. And it seems all our defenders generally pass the ball forward well and also progress the ball. I’m surprised Gabbia’s def win rate isn’t higher.
    That being said, I don’t rate Pav very much. He’s a very clunky defender. He does show up on the other side of the pitch but that’s because last year Allegri ball was abysmal for our attackers.

  7. how about use two central defender as strikers,
    Full back as play makers?

    This milan… has really nothing to do, right lol

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us