Marco Nasti returned to AC Milan after his loan spell at Bari this summer, but he will not stay for the upcoming season. According to a report, his move to Cremoneese is now just one step away and it will be with a familiar formula.
Nasti managed to find the back of the net seven times while on loan at Bari, attracting interest from a few Serie B clubs and even top-tier sides. However, he travelled with Milan for the pre-season in the US and scored the winner against Manchester City.
According to Daniele Longo, the 20-year-old is now ready to pack his bags again, but not for another loan. Indeed, Cremonese are about to secure the striker on a permanent basis and the transfer fee will be more or less zero 0, with a 50% future resale clause.
It’s a familiar formula these days as Atalanta just completed the signing of Marco Brescianini, whom Milan sold to Frosinone with the same terms. The Rossoneri are hoping for a payday down the line, in other words, and Nasti will be looking for his big breakthrough.
Cremonese finished fourth last season and will be aiming for promotion this campaign, hoping that Nasti’s goals can take them there.
I love that we started using the resale thing on almost everything.
I know alot of people dont like talking about money.. but we are on top of the food chain economical in serie a. Teams beg us for loans.. love it 🤭😍
milan agrees to everything like an easy woman.
LMAO
LOL
🤣🤣
Yeah like your mother
At least if he prove to be a great striker we can buy him back at 50% discount. Or if we dont want him, we will get 50% his transfer fee in cash.
It’s effectively a new way of doing joint ownership of players. The 50% future resale.
We might no longer own them on paper buy still have a big stake in their future.
And equally the provincial club has a lot more incentive to actually develop the player than in a typical loan + option.
Particularly if they don’t immediately do well during a loan.
Its different… in joint ownership we have a say in the player future/transfer. With future resale, we have no control at all of the player, and only accept the fee.
Well joint ownership was outlawed.
My point was that they seem to have found a way to almost achieve the same thing.
Just like Colombo, he’s left footed striker that we don’t have on the first team strikers. But sadly Milan decided to leave him.
For a striker it doesnt matter much, does it?
Afaik the foot preference matters for position like winger/inverted forward, fullbacks, and CB. Maybe in 2 striker formation, but in the single striker formation like 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3 it doesnt matter if the striker is right footed or left footed. If he is ambidextrous its advantage of course.