Home » Pellegatti sceptical regarding Milan’s summer investment: “If I sell for 40, I buy for 40”
Giorgio Furlani, Chief Executive Officer of AC Milan

Pellegatti sceptical regarding Milan’s summer investment: “If I sell for 40, I buy for 40”

Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

Journalist Carlo Pellegatti has expressed concern about AC Milan’s strategy of reinvesting (or not reinvesting) all the money from sales.

With Malick Thiaw expected to join Newcastle United in a €40m operation, Sky are among the sources to report that Milan’s proceeds would go above €150m for the summer. The other big exits were Tijjani Reijnders (€55m, to Manchester City) and Theo Hernandez (€25m, to Al-Hilal).


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


However, at the moment Milan have only spent less than half what they have received. This percentage will increase with the signings still to come, but more departures could be completed as well, like that of Yunus Musah to Nottingham Forest.

In a video posted on his YouTube channel, Pellegatti reacted to the news that Milan have sealed a €20m deal for Koni De Winter to replace Thiaw, of which an excerpt can be seen below.

“It’s not my fault if we didn’t make it to the Champions League, we can’t just sell everyone because we need money, and besides, a lot of players have arrived.

“If I sell for 40 [million euros], I buy for 40, not for 20. When you bring in 20, you look for someone worth 10, that’s not right.”

Tags AC Milan Carlo Pellegatti

54 Comments

    1. ini bangsat mana lagi… Kau ngerti yg di omongin gak sih. Pellegati itu protes ke manajemen, milan abis jual Thiaw dg harga 40jt, bukannya Milan cari pemain top lain yg seharga itu tp malah cuma beli separonya.

      1. KAU YANG BANGSAT, PELLEGATI ITU SIAPA? DIA LEBIH PINTER DARI IGLI TARE? JUAL TONALI 70JT DAPAT REIJNDERS SAMA PULISIC, KAU KIRA NILAI PEMAIN BAGUS CUMA DARI MAHAL MURAHNYA HA? SAPA YANG TAU SISANYA BUAT BELI BEK LAGI APA NAMBAHIN BELI PEMAIN LAIN SIAPA TAU HAH?

    2. Et si quelqu’un souhaitait la mort pour vous ? C’est bien de ne pas être d’accord avec son point de vue sur nos transactions de transfert, mais pourquoi souhaiteriez-vous sa mort ? Grandis mec. Grandis.

    3. bwahaha.. orang yg namanya lo pake buat profil kena pecat krn ngusahain apa yg Pelegatti maksud diatas.. lo tau artinya quality/ Value/ Worth dr pemain ga?

  1. I really like this De Winter signing. 20 mil, very good
    Now try to offload the dead weight like Adli, Benaccer and maybe musah. 45 milllion at least for the three of them. Maybe than wr can sign another center back. Or maybe a good sriker who van compete with gimenez. And if we need more money we could maybe sell chuku since we are only playing once a week. Maybe even loan him out so he can improve

  2. That’s why Pellegatti is a pundit and not a director of football. Surely we shouldn’t spend the same on every replacement just cuz numbers? Asinine statement.

    1. We just got 15M for free.
      3 weeks ago we would be happy to sell Thiaw for 25M.
      This was the opporunity to go and get a bang. To get the fans hyped.
      Winter is not as good as Thiaw, period. So we have downgraded out defense.
      If you are happy to weaken the team, perhaps you should not be a Milan fan?
      Its weak mentality. Pellegatti is right. You are wrong.
      Sorry, but the truth needs to be said.

  3. We have no European football. We will have a revenue shortfall. If we replace players with better more committed players, what is the problem?

    1. You can cover that shortfall with 70 million euros over three years. We are profitable three years straight. With Tijjani’s sale, last year is balanced. We have 70 million, plus the other sales to invest, increased sponsorship money as well. Central defense has been a weakness. They need to invest more than 20 million, especially with only 4 defenders, Gabbia was the most consistent and we will need 6 CB this year. Pavlovic and Tomori are liabilities more often than not. Gabbia has bis moments where his is not so great as well.

      De Winter is a solid signing. He isn’t enough to increase the level of that position. Especially not with an extra one needed to shore up the central defense. Our RB is completely bare of any viable options for a CL level squad even in Italy as well. We have the money and those positions are atill not addressed with friendlies done. All the preparation made with Thiaw has been thrown out the window. That can cost us CL again since we are going into the season with a team that is no prepared than last year, we dropped points for that very reason. It isn’t worth 40 million, or 20 million euros in gains.

      We lacked cohesion because coaches had insufficient time for preparation due to last minute signings for starting positions. Those have to be sealed early. This is a bad move. Unless you bring in an irrefutable star player who can change your team, these moves shouldn’t happen at this time of the window.

      1. This is ignoring the fact we are without European football and thus will have a revenue shortfall and we had prior debt.

        No dude. Just because we sold an inconsistent player for 40 million doesn’t mean we automatically spend the exact same money. De Winter is a great signing. He’s coming in for the central defense.

        All the preparation we did with Thiaw went out the window? Exactly how much has he played?

        De Winter isn’t a bad move. We are talking about someone who already knows the league. The bad move is overspending on some Italian player that is unproven.

  4. He’s right. If u want a good and better result, you must spend much as u sell. Milan is a big club. Create for title race, not a mediocre club. Have a profit with an average player is not good for a target to champions league. If italian have 4 slot, leave itnro juventus, inter, napoli and roma. They do better business than us.

    1. Because you sold a defender for 40m doesn’t mean you must spend 40m for his replacement. Tonali’s sale providing the funds for Pulisic and Reijnders prove this point.

      1. Tonali’s sale weakened a weakened position. Reijnders and Pulisic, as good as they were, weren’t enough to make up for his loss. The team results speak for themselves, over individual accolades. It upset the balance and chemistry that has yet to be recovered. The team was poorly constructed. Again, a central defender, a weak spot, has been sold, inherently washing out all the pre season work they did there.

        It takes at least 2 seasons to establish a good enough chemistry to contend for titles domestically and be competitive in Europe when you buy the cream of the crop. So when players come and go, and many purchases are liabilities, inconsistent, unestablished, you pay dearly collectively. If you buy midlevel players, and an average of one very good player who delivers per 3 yesr cycles…there will be hell to pay for it.

        1. Nothing was washed out by selling a central defender who arguably wasn’t even a starter to begin with. You are assuming. And Thiaw was a consistent weak spot last season.

          It’s utter madness not taking 40 million for him. In addition, there was an attempt to sell him earlier in the summer for potentially half that. So he wasn’t really part of the plans to start with.

          De Winter is better than Thiaw. And you will see that soon enough.

          1. Outside of Reijnders and Pulisic, everyone was a consistent weak spot last season. That’s what three coaches at a team in one year will do to you .

          2. And I approve of what is being done. I’ve slammed his management plenty of times. I want Furlani out. Tare though is doing the right moves and Allegri as coach, Ricci, Jashari, De Winter and so forth are all signings I like.

            I even spoke of De Winter as my first choice like two or three days ago lol

            Of course, we will see how the seasons go.

        2. With the money from the Tonali sale Milan bought RLC, Reijnders and Pulisic.
          The team improved.
          With Tonali they finished 5th, without 2nd. The team results do speak for themselves.
          Without Tonali they had more points and scored more goals than any year over the last 10+ years.
          Last season Milan problems were more about poor professionalism and lack of discipline because of lack of leadership than because the midfield was weakened 2 years earlier with Tonali leaving.
          Milan didn’t sell Tonali last summer but 2 summers ago. Just because Tonali was suspended from playing football doesn’t mean that a whole season of football was erased for everyone else.

          1. To add on top of what you said. Tonali sale in retrospect was fabulous move for the club, we have to be honest. Yes, he loves the club and the fans love him. He is a great player. However – everyone would have eaten him alive if he was suspended from football for a full year while playing for us. Obviously he needed to change the environment to deal with his mental issues and I hope he managed to do so. He left not only without hurting the club, but also providing funds that brought key players to our current team. Also he takes 2 or 3 times larger salary than he would in Italy, so let’s not pretend he was unhappy with the deal.

        1. Where did Milan go with Tonali the season after the Scudetto? Not first again 😉 Maybe it wasn’t just Tonali holding it all together in that team… Maybe Kessie had something to do with it?

  5. Musical chairs every gaddam transfer window.
    Sold Tijji for 55 to get a relatively unknown youngster at 40…. yippie for 15m and uncertainty….?!?
    Sold Theo and got Pervis ….for less offense and yet to be determined defense …?!?
    OK 😐

    1. yeah, yet to be determined if the new guy can even play a full season of 38 games, never mind if it is even at his previous level. He is a liability.

      Theo on a bad day was as good as this one at his recent best, who had a significant injury, we don’t even know if we will be able to rely on him to show up period. Theo wouldn’t cost much nore to retain over the span of the contract even at the numbers he requested. It would be 2 million more on the books for the next 5 years. For a known quantity, even when nit at his best. He would stay healthy, because he always has been and would benefit from being on a more balanced team too.

      1. … in theory.

        Theo wasn’t much of an offensive output nor was he a defensive certainty the last few seasons. i’m not sure why everyone speaks in hypotheticals and not facts.

      2. Just move on from theo , he is flop already after paolo maldini leave. Pervis still new, too early to judge him flop. Giving theo 8m euro nett was crazy , he dont have resale value anymore at that age . Good player not always come from expensive player. If you look at top 10 expensive signing from ACM , only 2 player have very successful : rui costa & pippo , other two like leao & tomori still decent ( win 1 scudetto ) , jashari also still new ( he is one from top 10 expensive signing) , the remaining 5 player are flop . Caldara are the worst expensive signing . Conclusion : ACM not lucky if buying expensive player

    2. Got 55 for a 27 year old and spent 40 on a 22 year old who is already more advanced than Tiji was when we got him….

    3. Because there aren’t other factors in play right? Like the loss of 80M from not playing in the CL, or that Theo had one year left on contract and the relationship with the club was broken. Tijji for 55M and spend 40 for a gain of “only” 15M? Oh no! Reijnders wasn’t the only sale. So add up 10M income here and 15M income there, etc., and we close that 80M gap and all the while still finding adequate replacements. There isn’t a cheat code for running actual football clubs.

    4. Exactly.

      But this is Redbird. Keep some profit satisfy the investors

      They will never spend all of the money nor go over budget.

      Are we better than last year? We should be just because we finally have a competent coach and system – so results will improve. But we finished 8th so not a huge leap of faith to finish better than that.

      Same thing over and over sell sell sell and buy cheaper players and take the profit and repeat each summer. This is the Redbird way

  6. “If I sell for 40 , I buy for 40.”
    What an ignorant thinking.
    Just because you buy a player that cost 40 mil doesn’t mean that he is better than the 20 mil player.
    The point is to replace the outgoing player with a player that is around the same level with the player you sold, and if you can do it for half the money makes it even better.
    Are Commuzo or Leoni better players than De Winter just because they cost more than him?
    I don’t think so.
    But let me guess, pellegati is upset Milan didn’t splash 40 mil on a player who has played 14 games of professional football.

  7. De Winter at 20m has almost the same skillset at Thiaw, what exactly are we missing?

    Gabbia-Pavlovic or Gabbia-Tomori will be the starters either way

    1. Totally. Small point though, I’m convinced that we’re going to use a 3 CB formation and that De Winter is going to play a bunch.

      1. Maybe, maybe not. if we get Athekame done, I think we may opt to a back four, and that De Winter may actually start instead of Tomori.

    2. people wanted a significant improvement. Thiaw for De winter is probably even in terms of skill. A win in $$ is meaningless for most fans. (including me). If the 20M were to be invested in someone, ppl would be glad. But $20 on redbird pocket is meaningless to us.

  8. Pellegatti not happy unless he’s whining about something. And he needs content.

    I don’t disagree that the entire 40 mil, or most of it, should be reinvested. But add that to the striker budget. Or get two CBs for one.

    You don’t have to blow 40 mil on one guys. Chirp chirp chirp.

    1. Another great point. Get a Thiaw replacement for half the money we got, and add the balance for another position that we need real quality in. But no, people complain that we didn’t spend the whole 40 on a CB and then if we do will complain when we bring in a 30M striker instead of a 50M one.

  9. Not sure who takes Pellegatti seriously anymore. Last season he was sure Milan would turn it around… He’s old and irrelevant.

  10. Pellegatti is an idiot.
    WE are earning almost 60M to 80M less in revenues for this coming season because we won’t have any prize money from UCL. This is due to the failures of Ibra, Furlani and Moncada from last season.

    In order to maintain our current level, sacrifices have to be made. That means to lower COST by as much, if not MORE than the missing revenues, OR to find ways to earn more money than we spend. So far we have sold around 148M worth of players, and bought around 98M worth of replacement. We still have to find a RB and a rotational ST.

    If we manage to do that with a net ZERO spending, that means Redbird don’t have to give us the usual 50M in transfer budget every year. We can use that budget to cover for most, if not all of the missing revenues for this year (the 60M to 80M mentioned before). Then if we improve results from last season and earn a bit more prize money, we would end the 25/26 season already in a financially healthy spot.

    We don’t want to run this club into the ground like Berlusconi did where he was forced to weaken the team and ended up selling to some Chinese fraud. Being Financially responsible, whilst maintaining a decent level of players on the pitch is a must if we want to play in Europe next season after qualifying for it.

    FFP exists and is not going away, as dumb as the rules are, so we have to follow them. And without owning our own stadium, earning revenues can only take us so far.

    Inter did it another way, by cheating the system with massive debt and buying big players to win prize money, but that was not sustainable. Once those one-off good seasons don’t happen just one time and they they have even one bad year, then the regular money they can earn will not be enough to cover for their massive expenses/debts. That’s how their Chinese owner ended up losing the Club to a hedge fund, because he could not repay the money he owed to them.

    If you are not financially responsible in Italy and you don’t own your own stadium, your club can financially end up dead (we have seen so many instances of that, the latest one Brescia).

    1. Why exactly? Do you even know? Milan can spend money this year and be good with FFP. The whole point should be creating a strong team, not winning the financial Scudetto again and being 6th. Irrelevant how much the player costs. 4 CDs and playing 3 at the back. Joke. Striker will be signed when?

      Also “ Once those one-off good seasons don’t happen just one time and they they have even one bad year, then the regular money they can earn will not be enough to cover for their massive expenses/debts. ” what? Oaktree has 200+ billion. Which debt?

      1. You sound like an idiot too, so I’ll spell it out for you.
        Inter was owned by Sunning. They spent money irresponsibly and that is why Inter are now no longer owned by them.

        Oaktree having money and assets means nothing because those are assets that they will not use on Inter Milan. Look at their current mercato. They can’t even buy anybody without selling first.

        Oaktree are the repo men that came in after Sunning messed up financially.
        If you want Redbird to spend irresponsibly like that, then you better have another buyer in place for Milan who would be willing to cover for the financial mess that you want them to make.

  11. This old man again.

    Thiaw was worth €9m when we bought him, there were players worth €40m but Milan doesn’t do business that way, instead we buy young talents, prospects who don’t cost too much and watch them appreciate in value.

    From Tonali to Reijnders to and now Thiaw. He became a €40m player at Milan.

    If Thiaw at €9m wasn’t considered a bad buy, I see no rationale why a €20m for a defender would be considered bad.

    Truth be told, Thiaw wasn’t worth more than €30m.
    Milan leveraged on certain parameters like the proximity to the start date of the season to negotiate a good price for the deal.

    Milan acted not interested in selling so more money will be offered for the player, tge same tactics being used for the Musah’s case.
    Finally, we are beginning to sell our players for good values, this is something we never used to have.
    Good job Tare.

  12. He’s right. A pundit who knows more about football than these bum americans who own the club and running it into the ground !!! It all started by firing Maldini because he is a winner and expected those baseball bums to do what they were supposed to do. We are all waiting for the day these baseball bums leave our club and take that avarage overhyped mid Chelsea’s bench warmer of a player pulisic with them

    1. Sure, they’re running it into the ground by keeping it profitable and improving the squad. Get lost with your racism.

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us