Home » Player Ratings: Genoa 1-2 AC Milan – Unexpected heroes for the Rossoneri
Milan players before Genoa game

Player Ratings: Genoa 1-2 AC Milan – Unexpected heroes for the Rossoneri

Photo by Simone Arveda/Getty Images

AC Milan clinched a massive win at the Marassi thanks to two second-half goals, courtesy of some unexpected heroes. Below are the player ratings for the Rossoneri. 

Massimiliano Allegri and his men headed into the game with one clear target: to win the game. That became obvious early on as the performance was far from great, but at least they got the job done in the end. Now, top four feels a whole lot closer.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


If you haven’t already, make sure to check out how we decide the player ratings. From the scale to what affects the rating, we have compiled everything there.

Short version

🥇 Nkunku (6.5 – MOTM): He wasn’t always super vigilant, but he sniffed out the danger and made the most of a poor Genoa backpass. Great penalty too, it has to be said, calmly sending the keeper the wrong way. That said, he did scuff a pretty good chance that Athekame set up, otherwise it would have been a 7.

👎 Gimenez (5): Sadly, far from good enough from him. The movement wasn’t necessarily poor, but he was way too timid on the ball (especially when he got it in the box) and also squandered a good opportunity by not being quick enough. Back passes when it didn’t make sense, etc., etc. 

👔 Allegri (4.5): I agree with the starting eleven, but once again, the opponents managed to absolutely pick us apart at the back. It doesn’t matter that we created a little more in attack when the defence is so leaky. It’s been a problem for weeks now and the gaffer hasn’t found a solution.

Starting XI

Maignan (6): The goalkeeper wasn’t tested that many times, truth be told, but he did make a very good save on Ekhator right after Milan’s second goal. He couldn’t do much about the goal conceded either, with it being from such close range.

Tomori (5.5): I’m not sure what has happened to him in the last few months, but there seems to be no balance in his plays and decision-making. Some rash challenges today, poor passing and general uncertainty. Of course, there were some good moments too but not enough for a passing grade.

Gabbia (5.5): Handled the duels with the Genoa forwards pretty well in general, but he probably could have done better on the goal conceded. Yes, the touch is hard to avoid, but he could have stayed closer to Vasquez to begin with.

Pavlovic (6): Solid defending for the most part and some good runs up the pitch, as well as calm and effective decisions in the build-up. Definitely enough for him to earn a passing grade here.

Athekame (6.5): The goal ended up being super important, hence the 6.5 here, and it was a really nice strike. That said, he got lucky that Vitinha missed his big chance a little earlier as that was very poor defending. You can possibly also ask questions on the goal conceded, as his man headed it into the box.

Zachary Athekame Milan
Photo by Simone Arveda/Getty Images

Fofana (5.5): Very much a ‘meh’ display with not much to show for in terms of interceptions and driving forward with the ball, which is usually his strengths. He also held back with some tougher passes which is never nice to see.

Jashari (5.5): Overall I actually think he was decent, and he definitely fought hard which was needed in such a physical battle. However, that backpass which Ekhator got a hold off could have been very costly for Milan, warranting a below-par rating.

Rabiot (6): He could have been more effective with his passing in the final third, with a few ones that frankly didn’t make any sense, but he got stuck in a lot in midfield. That was important already in the first half, when his teammates seemed to be a little bit sleepy.

Bartesaghi (6): Similarly to Rabiot, it wasn’t exactly a standout performance in terms of passing and many end products, but he wasn’t afraid to take on the fight. Committed some fouls to stop Genoa’s momentum and wasn’t booked for it. Smart defending.

Gimenez (5): Sadly, far from good enough from him. The movement wasn’t necessarily poor, but he was way too timid on the ball (especially when he got it in the box) and also squandered a good opportunity by not being quick enough. Back passes when it didn’t make sense, etc., etc.

Nkunku (6.5 – MOTM): He wasn’t always super vigilant, but he sniffed out the danger and made the most of a poor Genoa backpass. Great penalty too, it has to be said, calmly sending the keeper the wrong way. That said, he did scuff a pretty good chance that Athekame set up, otherwise it would have been a 7.

Christopher Nkunku of Milan (left) celebrates with his team-mate Zachary Athekame
Photo by Simone Arveda/Getty Images

Substitutes

Fullkrug (6): The first part of his substitution wasn’t what mattered, but at the end when Milan defended their lead, he was instrumental in keeping the ball by the corner flag. Also combined well with Pulisic for a chance right at the death.

Ricci (5.5): Committed the foul that eventually lead to Genoa’s goal, even if it was probably right to stop the counter like that. Still, more so than that, his entrance didn’t feel like an injection of energy.

Pulisic (6): Just about got to the ball and set up Athekame’s goal with a toepoke, getting his first assist since March. Had a pretty good chance to score at the end but was denied by the keeper after a nice give and go with Fullkrug. Just shy of a 6.5 perhaps.

De Winter (5): It was too poor from him on the goal, even if you could argue that it’s scrappy at the end of the day, but I also think he was a little rash in the usual challenges. Maybe should have had a free-kick more against him in the end.

Loftus-Cheek (6): Pretty much what you would expect, providing a passing lane down the right-hand side and also some physicality in those corner flag battles. Decent indeed.

The manager

Allegri (5.5): I don’t know about this one. Yes, we got the win (and what an important win!), but the performance was pretty terrible once again. If it hadn’t been for Nkunku’s awereneess, god knows how this would have ended.

Tags AC Milan Player Ratings Genoa-Milan

160 Comments

    1. We all said the same thing about CdK (me included), but we know it’s not fair for him to be judged too early. I’m excited to see him next season.

      1. Maybe not, but the management should stop with these record braking Belgian/Dutch deals. If ~35 millions is spent, you would expect a player to perform from the get go, not a season or two later.

        Then again, some players are just not suitable for Milan. I’m convinced that should De Ketelaere be brought back, he will struggle just the same.

        1. You were wrong about CDK, and you’re wrong about this kid (who was injured for several months, to begin with). Stick to cricket.

          1. Both failed at Milan. Here is De Ketelaere’s statistics for AC Milan, to refreshen your memory a little:
            – 40 Games, 0 Goals, 1 Assist.

            I could not care less if Jashari is sold to Atalanta and will flourish there. I am not an Atalanta fan.

  1. These ratings are a joke. It’s like you asked someone without eyes to make the ratings, based on the sounds the commentator made.

      1. Nah, it’s irrelevant in any case. Whatever I think as well as your subjective opinion. I suggest you give Nkunku 8 for taking the gift Genoa gave. He did nothing else.

      2. Not agreeing with Max here but it was Ricci that made the backpass to Ekhator not Jashari. And that you factored in to his rating. I’d definitely give Jashari a pass today. And he’s better and more technical than Ricci.

          1. Thanks
            Yes correct. I went to re-watch the play and was indeed Jashari. What confused me was that they showed Ricci right after 😳

      3. Oh my bad, it was indeed Jashari. Point of correction
        That was a serious mistake in a league like Serie A

  2. I can’t believe I’m saying this but let’s say we qualify for the CL.. do we really want to head into next season with the Allegrisaurus? I’m leaning no…

    1. Alegri has to go regardless of Champions league or not, his brand of football is painful to watch, we get pick apart by smaller teams and in a very annoying way.

      I kid you not, with the way Milan plays, I can pick an eleven around my street and comfortably beat this Milan team.

        1. It’s almost like the management have a pact not to hire the best available option. De zerbi was literally waiting on us before his Marseille move, we need someone outside Italy, who is young and has an exciting play, anything short of this we are getting dumped out of Europe, even if it’s Conference league.

          I stand on the hill that we have quality players, maybe and upgrade here and there but this crop of players can do a decent job, take a look at Manchester united fortunes with a coach change, same players just a little tweak in system.

          1. Based on how the last season went, I’d say Allegri was the best option, even if he wasn’t first choice… He has his faults, but he also has this team on the brink of returning to Europe.

    2. At first I was on the team “keep Allegri” if he secures the UCL spot since he was brought for this exact reason, plus the team being so bad isn’t his fault.
      However, after few monthes not only we are not progressing, but actually regressing, and thus despite having a full squad and playing once a week.
      Even with no striker, a team should be making progress playing wise, otherwise what is the coach doing ?
      So no, I’m not really sure I’d be excited to watch us against Bayern or PSG like this.

      1. I agree – management screwed him over w/ Fullkrug in January and players haven’t been performing but this collapse is the worst I’ve seen in living memory- worse than Pioli’s..

      2. Neither Allegri nor any of the coaches that came before him were properly reinforced with the players they needed. Every single mercato was a disjointed knee-jerk operation.

        The difference is Allegri is actually making a soup out of sh*t ingredients. it’s an awful soup so far but a soup nonetheless. Whereas before him there was a sh*t porridge on the table. Allegri isn’t the answer moving forward, but he is what was needed this season.

    3. He will not be coach next season. He will be blamed for not getting more out of some of these players and for the brand of football.

    4. He has to go regardless. But I’d prefer missing the CL over Allegri ruining the team for the next 5 years and embarrassing us in Europe.

      1. Ask yourself this question. How many quality players would we need to purchase to be able to compete in Europe as well as domestic next season?

    5. Nope, we absolutely need change but I have the same fear as you, we might be stuck with him for another year

  3. In a game of football where you need your opponent to slip up so you can capitalize on the mistake, Milan setup for Alegri makes sure the opponent are never under any pressure, even when they make mistakes, there’s no one to take advantage of it. The opponents can comfortably make mistakes at the back cus our pressing is trash, all thanks to Alegri ball.

    If Nkunkun had not taken the initiative to press, we’d maybe not scored a single goal and inversely the opponent tries to make sure we don’t get any rhythm at all, this thing Alegri is doing isn’t football of a big club like Milan.
    Regardless of position, Alegri should be gone come seasons end, we cannot compete in Europe with this football, we are even barely surviving in Seria A.

  4. Ratings are almost irrelevant at this point. We got the 3 points, which is great, but what a horrific game. Genoa had us pinned in the first half and thank God their attack is as bad as ours. That one lucky goal ( kudos to nkuku who poached it right) kind of demoralized Genoa. Anyways, CL or not allegri gotta go. Hopefully the rumors that came out this week, furlani, moncada, tare and ibra all leave with him.

    1. It’s ok to complain if your team turns in a dogshit performance week in and week out regardless of winning today I know I for one am sick of seeing Allegri’s team perform. Is it not apparent to you that almost everyone of our players has regressed this season? Idk maybe you only watch Como games which would explain why your posts here are idiotic

        1. A true fan always follows their team. Get angry at them, say things like i won’t watch them, or why am I watching. But in the end they still watch them. As a fan it’s delusional to be happy with a team that gets dominated by a bottom half team with nothing to play for. It’s delusional to be happy with this team when they play such a horrific football for most of the season. So go ahead be happy with our non milan worthy performances.

          1. We were not dominated. We had more chances away from home. We had less posession than usual, but that’s meaningless. It’s not as if Mike had to turn in a MOTM performance. Given the recent form, it was a good result. Everyone’s darlings, Como, had their second single goal victory and Spaletti, who some want or wanted as coach, has his Juve team in 6th. Serie A is a competative league and we don’t have a great squad. The main thing is to get a UCL place then a new coach and better players.

          2. No “true fans” like you have dragged the team down to where it is with your delusions of grandeur .

            People calling for another upheaval this summer (which will happen if Allegri leaves) are the bane of the club.

        2. So you are telling us to do what you did, pick another team to support?
          Milan and Como are direct rivals for the final 2 UCL spots. I see why you like this mediocrity. It benefits Como.

          1. You’re too clever to still not understand the Como thing.

            I won’t be explaining myself again.

            Maybe focus on the people on here laying into the manager and players .

            Oh that includes you. I see why that’s difficult. Keep deflecting onto me.

          2. I think most of you should. With your stories of projects and what not. Atalanta is a great project, Como as well.

          3. Maldini’s heir with his other accounts…. we didn’t drag the team down. Red bird took care of that. That upheaval that you talk about will happen regardless this summer. That’s what angers the fans the most, besides bad performances. Fans do want stability and a solid project for the club. Doubt it that this dinosaur and the bankers can deliver that.

        3. Mr Como of all ppl talking about stop supporting the team. Not everyone is like you who jumped ship to actively support another team then wishes Milan lose.
          Don’t make me pull the receipts again to remind the new ppl

    2. you cant focus on how nice the sails look when the hull of the ship has a titanic sized hole below, kiddo. We can give props for the good things, ofc, but you cant just ignore the fire in the other room. Pretending things are fine is what got us into this mediocrity mess in the first place. You sound like our owners making excuses for getting worse…

    3. You complaining about people as always it seems. I’ve said this 50 times already, people are free to express themselves the way they seem fit, including you.

  5. i ThInK wE’Ll lOsE tHiS gAmE – alleged Milan ‘fans’

    If you dont even have belief stop watching it

    1. Being realistic is wrong now??? We barely won by 1 goal, little guy. We got lucky Athekames lapses in focus didnt bite us. Stop accepting mediocrity and demand better.

  6. How many strikers in the history of serie A failed to score a single goal after playing more than 800 minutes ?
    It can’t be that many.

  7. Can’t wait for this season to come to an end. Never have I suffered so much through one season of biting my nails, sitting on the edge of my seat…unbelievable how a midtable team completely bottled us up for close on 90min and all we can do is wait for the final whistle to blow…

  8. Another ugly game but the win is all it matters right now.
    Nkunku and Athekame to the rescue.
    We finally found someone that can take penalties
    Even though Rabiot had some bad passes in the 1st half, he should be the MOTM. He was everywhere and as always put in a shift.
    Jashari actually had a good game until that dumb backward pass. Hopefully Modric is able to play vs Cagliari.
    Gimenez looked bad. Fulkrug should start next to Nkunku in the last game.
    Athekame needs to work on his defensive awareness. He losses concentration and falls asleep.
    Lets see if they can play one final good game and qualify for the UCL.
    Ha ha 😂 Juventus lost. From 3rd to 6th and they have to play the Torino derby next.
    On to Cagliari

  9. We’re at third place rn, but one mistake can place this team as low as sixth position. Calciopoli, bribery, scoring mafia, and match fixing can potentially happen in this situation. Who can bet what team at the end of this season.

    1. No such thing will happen. There is no conspiracy. Serie A is the most closely scrutinised league in the world, because of past history.

      1. I’m sure the Rocchi and refereeing scandal happens precisely because this is ” the most closely scrutiniZed league in the world”..

  10. Luka Jovic still outscores all these clowns we have in attack, and he left last summer. He would fit just right in this system, but he had to leave because of that snake Zlatan. Abate also left because of Zlatan, and he would be a good coach for Futuro, and maybe a couple of years later for first team. And Zlatan was the one that leaked Allegri’s undesired player list to the players. He has to go together with that other snake Furlani. Then we can maybe start a serious project.

    1. 100% correct. I have high hopes for abate. He was doing great with the primavera team. He is doing good at stabia now. Hope, he becomes a great coach.

    2. I don’t think you’re remembering how useless Jovic was in a 2 man attack last season… Most of his goals came on when Fonseca and Conceicao threw the kitchen sink on up front. Hell, even Okafor scored then.

      1. I remember, he was not useless. And to add something else, before cup semi finals with Inter, Ibrahimovic came in the locker room and insisted that Gimenez must play instead of Jovic, Conceicao insisted that Jovic plays because he was a better fit to his strategy, and Gimenez was in poor form. Ibrahimovic replied ‘if Jovic plays tonight, you are both out of the club at the end of the season’. Conceicao ignored him, played Jovic, who scored 2 goals and we won. Both Sergio and Jovic were out when season ended. I can only imagine what he did to poor Fonseca, and they were both young and solid coaches. I know this because a friend of mine works as a physio in Conceicao’s team.

    3. The one who shouldn’t go for me is Tammy. Aside of the penalty fiasco, he seems to always have the right spirit. He knows the league well. He can also be useful in the front 2 formation. He closes in scoring 20 goals this season. But I guess his valuation along with his wage was just not feasible. So that’s that.

  11. HUGE WIN

    Milan are 3rd going into the last game against Cagliari with a 2 point cushion.

    Everyone on here would’ve taken this at the start of the season. So show some gratitude.

    As for the performance they were under pressure for most of the first half. They then took control in the second half.

    I thought Jashari did well until that awful, inexplicable error at the end.

    But it was one error. And players will make errors.

    He’s had one injury ravaged season. They cannot give up on players like that .

    The rest did ok. It was all 6s and 6.5s.

    It’s ludicrous giving a manager of a winning team a poor score.

    1. Agree that the rating on Allegri today was nonsensical.
      He didn’t have enough fit players to try a different formation.
      He managed the starting lining up and changes well. We scored 2 goals and conceded a scrappy one.

  12. Outside the man-bun, Rabiot has been a joy to watch this season, bringing a lot in terms of skill and experience. The same goes for Modric. Anyways, good win amid the pressure and the chaos. One more match to go. Forza Milan!

  13. What’s wrong with Italian football: a player like Jashari who obviously has great drive and potential doesn’t get the chances because he makes 1 stupid mistake per game that is costly. I agree that shouldn’t happen, but that’s just football. You can’t just bench him for making mistakes with the alternative being Ricci who doesn’t make those big mistakes but offers absolutely nothing. Give the young players trust and time. But no, in Italy 1-0 is enough. I actually prefer the Netherlands mentality (where I’m from). It’s a bad competition sure, but at least young players don’t get benched for making a mistake, because they play on the offense and there’s always 4 or 5 more chances to redeem your mistakes. I feel very sorry for Jashari for having to play under such a dinosaur that rather has his team making no mistakes and having one shot on goal.

    1. He’s playing for Milan, one of the greatest teams in history. Mistakes aren’t accepted. Poor performances aren’t expected. If you settle for mediocrity then that is what you will get!

      1. What does history matter?

        The club sacked its history .

        And the players who were part of that greatness ALL made mistakes.

        Costacurta cost Milan the world club cup with a similar back pass.

        What’s keeping Milan from returning to greatness is sacking every person who makes a mistake.

        Some way to build loyalty, cohesion and confidence.

      2. Brother hes barely gotten a chance to even play with his teammates regularly on the pitch, give him some damn time you Muppet. Bart came good AFTER he was given an extended run in the team. Jashari can do the same but has to actually be given a chance. A chance hes not been given because allegri is a moron

      3. Tonali was mediocre all of his first season at Milan, whats your point? He went on to define mediocrity at Milan?

        Don’t talk about things you clearly don’t understand. Players don’t improve or become more confident in themselves by only making cameos.

    2. He is not just making mistakes, he is offering nothing as well, I am beginning to question the quality of the Jupiter league for him to be the best, he is not worthy of Milan, I am not a footballer but I can do better than Jashari, a midfielder that offers nothing other than running around as if its track and field

      1. So short sighted. When at Brugge he was amazing, not just in Belgium but also in the CL. You don’t think his poor performances have something to do with the facts this team has NO attacking plan? And that his playing time is limited? Come on people

        1. People don’t understand this isn’t PlayStation – you can’t plug’n’play. And not only that but he’s displaced by arguably one of the best midfielders in Europe and is getting scraps for minutes.

          Poor planning by Tare to spend 40mil on a backup. And he won’t even get that much more playing time even if Modric stays. So he’s looking at two years before getting consistent playing time?

          1. Exactly this. Even if he is super good you don’t pay 40M on a backup of a backup (currently). Especially when you “don’t have” money for a striker.

    3. Bus parking would make even Messi look bad. Also preferable to bus park with 30+ year olds, as they will naturally have less energy and want to park the bus.

  14. Jashari was poor, I don’t think running up and down is doing well, back pass or no back pass he was very poor and not Milan worthy.4
    Gimenez-did his best but I have seen enough of him, he is best at a mid table team not Milan worthy 5
    Rabiot- not that super today, some misplaced passes, unnecessary fowl 5
    Athekame – lost his man on the Genoa’s goal but still score a great goal 6
    Nkunkun- Not particularly brilliant but his awareness is great and very alert 6.5 motm
    Pavlovic, Tomori…,,5.5
    Fofana, not seen 4.5
    Ricci, Barthesaghi,RLC…5.5
    Gabbia- not the best from him, was relatively slow and couldn’t even handle Colombo, lucky not to get a red card 4.5
    Dewinter- should have done better on the goal-4.5
    Pulisic- provided an assist be it poking of leg or fortunate assist, should have scored he gets a 6
    Mike-6

    1. You forgot to give Leao a 10.
      Do you think Leao hustles to get to the ball before the goalkeeper like Nkunku did? 🤣

    2. Not sure that Gabbia couldn’t handle Colombo. Actually he won some duels against Colombo.

      Jashari committed one big blunder but otherwise his accuracy passing rate was 100% (if you don’t count that blunder). Yes, I gave him less of a pass because of the blunder, but I wouldn’t say he was poor. ONE mistake. Big mistake, but the opponents didn’t score from the mistake, so ultimately the mistake was of no consequence.

      Puli’s assist is not to be discounted. It’s a goal participation and it contributed to the victory, which, had we tied this game, we’d have been in a much worse position for UCL qualification. That counts.

      In my post I got most players a 5.5 but forgot that Fofana indeed likely deserved even less; good point.

      I don’t understand why you rated Pavlovic the same as Tomori. Pavlovic did much better and actually deserved a pass (6) in my opinion while Tomori performed poorly the whole game and got a yellow card.

      Rabiot wasn’t brilliant but 5 is too low. I think ultimately, he earned a pass. Almost scored, too, late in the game.

      Mike had nothing to do with their goal, and had a HUGE save in a 1 v 1 situation that preserved the win. That’s worth more than just a pass.

    3. You are such a Pulisic hater. He got an assist, nearly had another, and just missed a goal due to the Genoa GK’s toe poke save. I guess you weren’t around when Inzaghi was playing. He made his living scoring goals by popping up, toe poking, butt goals, etc. One of the best strikers we’ve had. No Leao, no problem. You’ll follow him out of the club this summer, no doubt.

      1. Pulisic apologist, didn’t he get a pass for the assist? Did he not miss a goal? It’s Pulisic we are right to say it was saved by the goalkeeper but if it’s Leao or others alike it’s a miss, double standard!!

        1. No, he shot the ball and the keeper saved it. From that angle, unless the keeper made a mistake he was never going to score. Anyone who has played would know that. A miss is not putting the ball on target. Hopefully Pulisic puts in his transfer request after the WC.

        2. The point is Pulisic made things happen in his 15 minutes. Chance creation. No chances, no goals. In fact I thought he and Fullkrug were a lot more lively and effective than Nkunku and Gimenez.

  15. Our only rating should be the 2:1 win and nothing else. Based on this poor game, what metrics did you use for your ratings? This was once again a terrible match to watch and no player deserved any rating especially when it’s the order of every match-sit deep, play awful, score one or two goals hoping it wins you the match, and yeah, that’s it.

  16. So short sighted. When at Brugge he was amazing, not just in Belgium but also in the CL. You don’t think his poor performances have something to do with the facts this team has NO attacking plan? And that his playing time is limited? Come on people

    1. Yes, it is Allegris fault that he gives the ball to the opposition in front of our box every game. For some reason only he does that but that is because he is amazing. Fofana is sh*t because he doesn’t try to make an assist for the opposing team, I get it.

      Milan overpaid and by a lot, he is 15M€ player. He might be good but in 2028, he needs 2-3 years to grow enough to be good enough for this level. Half of the players you look in Belgium look amazing, 90% of them fail later. Weak league makes everyone look great. Gimenez was scoring how many goals in the Dutch league?

        1. When? You are lying. If you find me saying that I will never comment again.

          Also “plays better football”. Couldn’t care less, they are 7th, 12 points behind.

          1. And we havent been able to beat them at all this season, despite them losing their coach and doing a complete club shift. Meanwhile you expect some kid whos barely been given minutes at all this season to already be the 2nd coming of Toni Kroos. Youre delusional, and an imbecile. Sit down and stop crying so loud

          2. Kid? He is 24 in 1.5 months. Second coming of Toni Kross is asking someone not to give a way the ball in a dangerous position 2 games in a row? Ok re*ard. Free Jashari, I am 100% sure you wrote this in July last summer. You reek of stupidity.

          3. Also, start supporting Atalanta or Como, over half of you here keep writing about these teams on every article about Milan. If you care so much about that start following them, I couldn’t care less.

        2. I am shocked how you guys keep talking about barely getting minutes he has played almost full 90minutes twice and made grave error in both matches, how many more minutes do you need to be convinced he is not worth how much we paid for him, it was daylight robbery paying 40M for him, he shouldn’t cost any team no more than €15m as rightly quoted by Max

          1. Compare Modric’ and Jasahri’s minutes this season.
            Are. You. Serious??? Two 90mn games are an adequate sample size?? Ludicrous.

          2. ACM1899 the point is he 100% isn’t a 40M player. He also did make mistakes twice in a row so that is worrying. He doesn’t have the technique and calmness to hold the ball in pressing situations. For the position he plays that is key. So I have to say 15M would be a good fee for him, but when he cost 40M I expect him to be ready to play 1st day.

        3. As an uninterested neutral, you seem to be making the other poster’s argument.

          CDK was a lemon during his (early) time with Milan. If they had given him 2-3 years, as is being recommended for Fofana, we’d now have a worthy winger in CDK. Likewise, give Fofana another couple of years and he’ll be excellent.

          The question becomes, do we have patience, or will Fofana bloom under different colors?

    2. Even if the team has no attacking plan, the last I checked he is a midfielder, how many visionary passs comes from him to any attacker, even the so call defensive play he keeps making fatal error. He is just not Milan worthy

  17. Have you actually copy-pasted Allegri’s rating from last week on the this article’s “short version”? How lazy are you? 😂 Even the 5.5 is beyond ridiculous. We patiently and without much risk (outside of what Jashari did, which wasn’t Allegri’s fault, a player you’ve given the same rating, btw 😂) won at one of the toughest grounds in Italy, in the most nervewrecking moment of the season. Not sure what you were expecting.

  18. Criticism has become the norm and an awful lot of it is fair (because whatever anyone tries to tell you, it’s ok to criticise the team you love), but today we were the better side in a poor game. Tough place to go (lucky enough to have been although it was Samp – absolutely incredible atmosphere), we needed the win, and that’s what we got.

    Jashari was very good in my opinion until that absolutely criminal pass. His mistakes tend to be costly and it’s affecting the perception of him. He was very lively in the first half especially.

    Pulisic looked like the player we signed. Here’s hoping he stays.

    Rabiot was phenomenal again.

    We conceded another shaky goal and De Winter was at the heart of it again. Have to be honest I’m not sure about him. In any case this bit of defensive frailty has come at the right time – rather now than start the season that way and have to fix it.

    One easy one to go!

  19. I keep trying to post but this site is the worst. It keeps resetting and erasing everything I wrote
    Bottom line a very ugly but massive win. My true worry for the team is pretty much every player has regressed as the season has gone on. And somehow Milan does not commit players forward into the attack…and is leaky in defense. How is this possible? In both cases not a good endorsement for Allegri returning….which sucks because the one thing Milan could use is stability. Coaches and players primarily staying and getting better. Instead I fear a fourth coach in two years, and another major overhaul to the roster.

  20. My comment got canceled by the “you’re posting to fast” when I hadn’t posted in 24 hours. Again. This website can be really frustrating.

    I won’t rewrite the whole thing.

    I had rated:

    Athekame 7.25 (goal, good game all the time)
    Nkunku 7 (earned PK, goal)
    Puli 6.5 (assist)
    Maignan 6.5 (huge 1v1 save)
    Rabiot, Pavlovic, Gabbia 6 (all barely)
    All the others 5.5 except for De Winter 5 (unlucky but did fail in their goal) and Tomori 4.5 (yellow card, generally ineffective)

    Allegri 5 (corto muso worked but barely; could have been a disaster)

    1. Hmm…. I wonder why you gave De Winter bad rating for a “mistake” that was not really his fault in a crowded center but Jashari gets a better rating for a horrible mistake that almost cost us everything ? Not saying Jashari was bad but both him and De Winter deserve a 5.5. But it’s whatever with yall and your favorites. lol

      1. Simple. It’s because De Winter’s mistake did result in a goal for the opponents while Jashari’s mistake didn’t. In my longer post that disappeared, I did explain that, and said that Jashari had a rather good game with 100% accurate passing rate until that blunder; I said Jashari would have earned a pass or even a bit more, except for the blunder which put him under, but less bad than De Winter because at least from Jashari’s blunder there wasn’t a score for the opponent.

        I’m fine with rating him with the same score of De Winter if you insist, but it’s not a question of favoritism; just a personal criterion I have, that mistakes that result in goals for the opponents are worse than the ones that doesn’t, even if its someone else that rescues that play and not the player who committed it. Ultimately goals matter and if there is no score for the opponent, then the mistake was of no consequence.

        1. Where is the logic in that? So you don’t rate players based on their actions but what others did? So if someone makes a mistake and the goalkeeper saves it it is a higher rating for the keeper and same for the one making the mistake. Or nobody because it cancels itself out? Your logic is not really logical at all. If you make 5 mistakes in a game and get lucky that the opposing team didn’t capitalize on them, you still did bad and made the mistakes.

          1. Simply, there is a difference between a mistake that costs us 3 points – such as scoring an own goal, getting a red card and tanking the team, conceding a PK, os serving the ball to an attacker that then scores, resulting in lost points, lost trophies or lost qualifications, and a mistake that bad as it could be, is of no consequence whatsoever because the opponents don’t capitalize. I can partially forgive a player for ONE mistake like the one Jashari did today but didn’t make us drop points. Otherwise he had a good game with 100% passing accuracy rate. Still I didn’t forgive him entirely. Was ready to give him a 6.5; gave him a 5.5 instead.

            What is not logical is you not seeing the logic in that.

            Sure, if someone has 5 bad mistakes, that’s a pretty bad game. Jashari however had just one.

            The issue here is comparing Jashari and De Winter. Both had ONE mistake each. One player’s mistake was of no consequence whatsoever. The other one resulted in a score for the opponents so I rated the latter half a point lower.

            If you can’t see the logic in that, I actually pity you. Wow.

          2. Man, there is no logic in doing ratings based on the outcome, not the actions of an individual. You can try and explain as much as you want, it is not correct.

            You are free to do ratings however you want them, if you want to rate 10 anyone that has blue eyes it is ok, your choice. But calling it logical? C’mon.

        2. Yes indeed you’re making a logical fallacy. It’s INDIVIDUAL ratings and what another player did with presented opportunity lay’s outside of the given INDIVIDUAL control. Jashari mistake was more glaring and avoidable and should warrant more on his rating. Even though on the otherside he should be given one more year at least to assert himself. It was obvious that he favors more instinctive and open play. Not the Alegrisourus corto muso overly cautious approach.

          1. It’s a team sport. Teammates such as a goalkeeper can rescue a player’s mistake making it LESS COSTLY. Even though it’s individual rating, consequences matter.

            Aren’t you madder at a player who scores a silly own goal or concedes a silly PK, making us drop 3 points, versus a player who makes a mistake but nothing happens??? Even when it’s a teammate who rescues him? I am.

            When we lost to Feyenoord what do you remember forever? A player who committed a silly foul, got a red, and tanked the team, eliminating us from the Champions League? Or a player who in that same game, made some mistake but nothing happened???

            I get mad at the incompetent who tanks the team, more than at someone who makes a mistake OF NO CONSEQUENCE!!!!

            Not seeing the logic in that is pretty wild!!! Whatever!

          2. @Luigi
            When you judge a player, you should judge what HE did, not how someone else took advantage of that or not.
            The fact that Jashari’s pass didn’t result in a goal against us is entierly thanks to Maignan and Genoa’s striker being bad. Therefore Jashari should get no extra point because his mistake didn’t result in a goal.
            If he did catch the striker and somehow blocked the shot or distracted him, yes you can make a case for him, but that’s not what happened today.
            The extra point or half point you gave to Jashari, you should give it to Maignan instead.

          3. But here is a sub question for you Luigi. Do you care how Milan plays? Why? In 20 years nobody will remember anything but the results and titles. If you play amazing football but end up 5th will you remember this? It is the same “logic” you are trying to apply here. So if you wont’ remember something in the future it is irrelevant at the moment it’s happening as well? Right? So winning 1-0 every game and not trying to score more is perfectly fine, since you won’t remember it anyway in 20 years.

        3. Unfortunately I have to disagree with you. The individual capacity to make mistakes needs to be calculated into a rating regardless of the outcome of that mistake. If someone constantly makes mistakes but is bailed out often by his teammates can’t have a higher rating than others. See Estupinan, Emerson Royal.

          1. You are all refusing to acknowledge that I DID ding Jashari’s rating by one full point, for his mistake. But he made only one, and nothing happened. I thought that De Winter’s mistake was worse as it lead to a goal by Genoa.

            Again, you’d have a point if I had NOT digned Jashari for his mistake.

            I simply dinged De Winter even more because his mistake had more consequences; damaged the team more. And I think this is perfectly logical and fair.

        4. I don’ t understand what you meant by 100% passing rate, passing to the next player beside you for a 40m rated player isn’t good, no vissionary pass, no defense splitting passing, no intelligent and creative play, other than constant fatal error week in week out, even when he made that unpardonable error of a pass, you can tell from his reaction, the way he laid down flat on his back. That pasd alone is enough to fail him

    2. I am tired of an offense that is predicated on the other team making a mistake. So, late in the game Genoa opens up, but if that mistake didn’t happen it would be a different game. You can’t have an effective offense that consistently scores if the strategy is waiting for a mistake.

  21. Good time for Nkunku to be raising his hand. Would not mind if they keep him as an impact player off the bench…provided we get decent strikers up front…Jash needs time, every player in this team has been guilty of a mistake or two, amd sometimes game defining mistakes. My patience is wearing thin with Tomori, by now should be the Kjaer type player but he is just regressing with everybody else. Hoping for the best in the last game, nervy moments but wishing we get to a UCL finish.

    1. He’s too expensive to be an impact sub. While there’s still value in him, it’s best if he’s sold.

      I’ve never been a fan of Tomori. Without Kjaer to hold his hand, he’s prone to mistakes. The sooner we move away from shopping in the EPL rejects bin, the better.

      De Winter, Gabbia and Pavlovic should be the starting defenders.

    2. I’ve lost patience with Tomori already. I think he should be sold in the next transfer window.

      He was once a good defender but regressed; he is also impulsive and prone to getting yellow and red cards, thus damaging the team even more. Not to forget, he is not a good companion; he yells a lot at his teammates when they fail, while making huge mistakes himself.

  22. I will never understand Allegris absolute downright refusal to start Fullkrug and Nkunku from the start. We saw last week how well it worked and how many chances fullkrug helped set up for the other forward, saw it again when he came on today. So WHY DORSNT HE DO IT FROM THE START!?!? Is he really just that butthurt that his preferred plan didnt ever work and he doesnt want to admit he was wrong? Guarantee he shoves leao back in the mkment hes cleared too… I stg if we throw the last game because his stubborn ahh just HAD to put his favorite boy leao back up top, im gonna lose it…

    1. For a long time Fullkrug actually played with a broken toe and I’ll actually commend him for that as Gimenez was out with an injury until March or something.

      1. I don’t think Colombo is worse than Gimenez in any respect. And i mean any. Yet he was discarded. Not to mention the home grown connection he felt. Let’s not mention Jović who is miles ahead.

        1. I haven’t mentioned either but sure I’ve always been of the view that we could have kept Colombo. Whether he is as good as Gimenez is debatable even when the Mexican has had a horrendous season he has nevertheless scored many goals in the Dutch league, I wouldn’t have minded for us to keep Jovic and Milan could have automatically have renewed his contract and apparently wanted to do so but the Serb wanted a 2 year renewal so the club let him go instead.

  23. Juve not going at Champion league so for me that is enough. Also this Genoa win against Roma
    We not good at all but this is not my problem,owners should be think were they spent 400mill. and bring Estupinan,Jashari,De winter,Salemakers,Fulkurg,Nkunku,Ricci they all 0000

    1. Why mention Saelemaekers when he he has been owned by the club since January 2020. Besides of that the Belgian has actually been an important player for this team at least he was playing good up until a couple of months ago.

  24. What a bunch of moaners 😂😂😂😂 People having a go at the team while others tell you to go support another team or find a new hobby 😂 peak stupidity. Thanks for laughs mates 👏 👏 👏

    1. “Mates” is a big big stretch. We aren’t even acquaintances. Do you tell people about your “mates” from SempreMilan? 😀

  25. Literally astounds me how many people can’t reason past “Allegri this…” and “Allegri that…” completely ignoring what he is having to work with.

    Allegri is not faultless in all of this. He hasn’t shown attacking patterns of play nor any progress in developing players. But who brought him here without reinforcing? Where did the decision come from to entrust this disjointed team full of holes to a man that isn’t known to build? It’s a miracle that this defense has come together not to allow more goals in than it has. And I maintain he has far over-performed this season despite Tare’s and Furlani’s idiocy.

    Barring a complete and next-level meltdown next game, he will have brought us back to CL. I’d say the man deserves our gratitude given the circumstances. Having said that, Milan should absolutely NOT continue with him next season unless they properly reinforce him. Allegri will not build anything – he will only manage.

    What is Milan’s plan moving forward? The ball is in Jerry’s court this summer.

    1. Indeed, they didn’t give Allegri a squad suitable for his playing style. They spent 40+ mln on Nkunku, a player with high potential but who is not suitable for Allegri’s tactics. Leao is not a second striker. Instead of spending 30 mln on a bench option, Jashari, they could have spent it on a good CB. In the end the cycle will repeat itself and the management will find scapegoats to redirect blame from themselves.

      1. You’re right. But neither Leão and Pulisic are suited to his tactics either. ACM will lose two 15 goals a year scorers. Maybe he can get Chiesa back to play wingback like at Juve.

        1. He didn’t sign himself. People at the club picked him and they knew his formation, tactics, everything. So someone else is to blame for this.

    2. I honestly have no problem with any particular formation. My problem is with a coach who says “I am playing x formation because that’s what I do”. I said a few times earlier in the season that Milan needed Allegri for one season so he could rebulid an actual team. I was wrong. I fully believe that he almost intentionally threw away 3 points vs Udinese by putting a poor lineup on the field just so he could say that he tried to change and it failed so he was right all along. The team has completely fallen apart since that game.

      You can make excuses that it’s management’s fault (and they definitely deserve a huge share of the blame) but any coach who plays one style, regardless of who is available is stubborn and incompetent.

      You could have every single player you want, hand-picked top to bottom. Unless you are the luckiest manager in the world, the team you start the season with is almost never the team you have throughout the season. You will have injuries, players who can’t keep it in their pants and tank their best season (I’m done defending Puli), and you will have players that just have bad luck or a run of bad form. You have to be willing and able to modify your approach to fit the personnel available or you will fail.

  26. @Giga94

    But I DID penalize Jashari for his blunder. I lowered his score by one full point. I was about to give him a 6.5, as up to that point of his ONE blunder, he had posted 100% of passing accuracy.

    I simply penalized De Winter even more because HIS blunder resulted in a goal for the opponents. It happened right inside the small box with no chance of recovery. Jashari’s instead was farther away, and it was then possible for Maignan to rescue him. Thus, it was a less damaging mistake.

    Sure, we judge a player by what HE does and not by what others do… thus my lowering Jashari’s score by one full point, despite that having been his only mistake in the whole game. Still, we can’t be completely blind to the CONSEQUENCES of a mistake. It’s another order of magnitude when the mistake results in a goal for the opponents. It’s still the player’s PERSONAL mistake, justifying his personal rating, when that mistake tanks the team, as opposed to a mistake that doesn’t.

    In this game, there were two bad mistakes, one for each player. One resulted in a score for the opponents. The other didn’t. Which one was worse??? Duh?!?!?

    Frankly, I am APPALLED that you guys are not getting it.

    If I had simply said “I’m giving Jashari a rating of 6.5 and not considering at all his mistake; I don’t care”, then you all would have a point. But no. I deducted a full point.

    It’s just that De Winter’s mistake was more costly for Milan.

    When Musah gets a silly red card, tanks the team, and the team is then eliminated from the Champions League, that is PRETTY BAD and both fans and professional journalists penalized him with a very low score. Like 2 or 3. He almost single-handedly took the team out of the competition.

    When someone loses the ball, but nothing happens and there is no opponent score and NO CONSEQUENCCES, evidently, it’s a less damaging mistake, thus the lighter penalty in ratings for that player, although a penalty was STILL applied. Again, many professional journalists take the consequences into account.

    This is not rocket science. It’s actually pretty simple.

    If you guys have a different criterion, fine. Use your own criterion at will, and post your own ratings. I’ll disagree but I will respect the way you do it.

    Me, I am not blind regarding consequences, and my personal criterion for mistakes include the order of magnitude of damage to the team.

    If you disagree with my personal criteria, fine. But they are the ones I live by, and I stand behind my ratings for Jashari and De Winter.

    1. It is rocket science from you since you’re still trying to explain how that is logical. Your subjective opinion and criteria is fine, of course you are allowed to do that. But explain everyone how that is logical is not. If someone gets a red card and the rest of the team pushes for him and they win you don’t care? Its fine because the 10 other players corrected it, so this player that messed up doesn’t get a really bad rating? Yes, logic 101. Of course. It’s a joke of an explanation. If you still prefer that fine, but it is not logical and makes no sense.

        1. And like I said, Milan News:

          Jashari 6
          Non parte bene, come tutta la squadra, preso in mezzo dalla pressione forte del Genoa. Poi, piano piano, sale di ritmo e intercetta almeno tre-quattro palloni interessanti che consentono al Milan di alzare un po’ il suo baricentro. Nel finale manda in porta Ekhator, ma Maignan salva tutto.

          dal 76’ De Winter 5.5: non perfetto sul gol del momentaneo 1-2 del Genoa).

          Haha, like I said. De Winter with 0.5 points fewer than Jashari, EXACTLY how I did.

          Huh, interesting, no? Maybe there is logic, after all… hahahaha

          Wait for tomorrow and the Italian newspapers. There will be more of this. Guaranteed.

          1. Clarification – these ratings reported by MN are from:

            Journalist Pietro Mazzara, collaborates with Tuttosport and Sky.

            Who should we listen to? Max, a poster from a fan website? Or Luigi, the same? Or professional journalist Pietro Mazzara?

            Give me rather Mazzara. And there will be more like him, tomorrow.

            I’m in good company.

      1. Again, for the 11th time, it’s not like I DID NOT LOWER HIS SCORE FOR HIS MISTAKE!!!! Why are you guys refusing to get that??? I did!!! One full point! For someone who up to that point had a freaking 100% accuracy rate!!! Which is why he didn’t deserve it to be lowered even more (especialy in the context of a mistake that had no consequence). Still, I did lower it.

        You are confounding what I said. I said hat IF I HAD SAID I DON’T CARE, YOU’D HAVE HAD A POINT. I did NOT say that I don’t care.

        Because I do care, I lowered his score.

        Only, De Winter’s mistake was WORSE!!! Impossible to recover from (it was freaking done in the small box!!!) and had more consequences (a goal for the opponents, which almost tanked the whole seasonal effort if Genoa had then, tied)! (Actually infinitely more consequences, given that Jashari’s mistake didn’t have any). Therefore I lowered his score MORE.

        But I did lower BOTH player’s ratings because of their mistakes. So, I do care for the mistakes.

        Just, some mistakes are more damaging than others. So, yes, THE PLAYER WHO MESSED UP MORE, got a lower score than the player that messed up less.

        THAT’s what is logical.

        Duh!

        Gee! Incredible!!!

        Im prepared to bet that professional journalist will rate De Winter lower than Jashari, when the Italian newspapers publish their ratings. Just wait and see.

      2. Rightfully so, Luigi should just let it slide, Jashari is poor and the logic use in defending him doesn’t add up

  27. What a painful watch. De Rossi is a good coach. You can see how well he’s done with what he has. Twice now. And as usual in Italy they don’t give young coaches or players any chance.
    Our future is Jashari, not Modric. I thought he did quite well. And I also thought was Ricci that made that backpass not Jashari but I’ll have to re-watch. They do have the same haircut and sometimes it’s hard to tell which ones which lol 😂
    Anyways lets hope we can stumble over the UCL line. I think 🤔

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us