Sacchi defends Pioli and shifts blame onto Milan’s summer transfer strategy

By Euan Burns -

Arrigo Sacchi believes that the summer business from AC Milan is more of a factor in their underwhelming season than Stefano Pioli’s leadership. 

Speaking during an interview with La Gazzetta dello Sport (via Pianeta Milan), Sacchi explained how he has known Pioli for a very long time and respects him as a tactician.

For that reason, he finds it hard to solely blame Pioli for Milan’s lack of a title charge and disappointing showing in the Champions League. He feels that some of the business that the club conducted in the summer has not helped Pioli achieve the goals set for him.

“I have known Pioli for a long time and he was one of those tactical coaches. I also think that over the years he has tried to become a strategist and come up with something of his own. Evaluations on him? It depends on the market, let me explain. I don’t know if all the foreigners who arrived at Milan last summer were chosen by the coach or at least with his approval. So it would be unfair to judge him for the upcoming results if he didn’t consent and didn’t endorse the signings. Otherwise, it is clear, he would have his responsibilities. In the first case he would not be at fault and if I were the president I would look at who chose those players. If, on the other hand, Pioli was involved in the decisions and then something didn’t work, he is also at fault. And I say this with regret because he is on the right path,” Sacchi said.

It is not clear what level of control Pioli had over the summer transfer business, but it is clear that multiple players like Christian Pulisic, Tijjani Reijnders and Ruben Loftus-Cheek have been very successful signings that have improved the team.

Sacchi then went on to explain that impulsive buying in the transfer market is not the way to create a winning formula in football these days, and Pioli only has a small amount of improving to do in that regard.

“I don’t know what the internal relations at the club are today, I was taking risks but I had the president’s back. In Italy we are in a crisis of planning, we look for the individual or the foreigner for lack of ideas. But spending is not necessarily the solution and winning is not automatic. To do that you need an international mentality and coaches must cultivate it. Tacticians put clubs in a difficult position by asking for signings that can make a difference and perhaps end up putting the accounts in the red. Strategists are needed: Stefano still has to make a small, small leap. Not a ‘big jump’,” Sacchi said.

Tags AC Milan Stefano Pioli

27 Comments

  1. Sacchi and his rants about foreigners… wtf is wrong with this dude? Majority of signings are performing. It was the “old guard” leo and theo mostly who had a really slow start to the season..

    Look, pulisic, performing, jovic okafor, performing, chuky is a sub so doesn’t matter, musah subs, doesn’t matter, tijani performing, ruben hot and cold, but that’s on pioli for not benching him when he’s cr*p. The only Italian they signed was benched instantly after he had a poor game. And the other Italian, lord and saviour, Gabbia. Pioli is just itching to bench him, for thiaw or kajer or kalulu.. the second one of them is available, boi needs to sit.. seems 2 me pioli doesn’t like Italian players.. but sacchi knows better..he knows pioli personally, and for a long time.. right?
    Probably both in the bald man club

    1. Ahh, the old Pioli mantra.

      Pioli: “Everything is fine. We played well for 75 mins.”

      Q: “But you lost 3-0”

      Pioli: “Well, aside from the goals we allowed, we moved the ball well and looked good”

      Q: “But you had 3 shots on goal and lost 3-0. Are you going to make any changes next match”

      Pioli: “I said we were playing great for 75 mins, tactics are great despite a few unfortunate moments. The plan remains.”

      3 games later, after losing again and again – jump to top of this post & repeat

      BTW, you gave our current midfield flying colors, “performing”, yes, performing poorly. Can you look up and post how many goals and assists each one has? That’s the point of the midfield is to push the ball forward and make plays to help our team score, right?

      The number is shockingly low. Maybe they are defensive midfielders? Ok, let’s look at their interceptions and ball win rate. OHHHHH. Not good either!

      How many assists does your “performing” midfielders have this year? Even worse, how many assists came against top teams, not low level serie A matches?

      At least use the data to back up your claims that our midfield is performing and doing a great job, because the statistical reality does not fit your argument.

      “tijani performing”

      1. I didn’t give flying colours and tijani is performing. If you want stats look them up and you convince me that he isn’t performing.. mkay?

        I’m perfectly aware our midfield, as whole, is cr*p. Mostly it comes down to pioli and how he wants them to play. Individually they’re doing fine. Ofc football is not an individuals game…

  2. Best transfer market in years. No comparison to last year’s complete disaster.
    There are still problems with the squad. Mostly defensive midfielders after Kessie and Tonali left, Bennacer missed half the season and hasn’t been 100% since he’s come back and Pobega has been injured almost all season long. Central defenders because Kjaer’s age is showing, Thiaw couldn’t replicate last season and Kalulu has been injured almost all season long.
    Generally the injury situation has been crazy this year. And it’s fully understandable that people blame Pioli in part for that – especially since he always plays the same guys. I mean he’s been super lucky that Theo hasn’t gone down so far. We’d be properly screwed.

    1. Better transfer than signing Kjaer and Ibrahivmovic in January and turning a side that had struggled to qualify for Europa League into title contenders almost immediately?

      Mostly the transfer market is about luck – it’s a form of gambling which is why it’s oh so popular with modern football fans.

      The season before’s signings were mostly unlucky, and in the case of CDK, he’s shown what he can do at our rivals, Atalanta.

      Last summer’s happened to mostly work out but we still have a massive gaping hole in midfield which is quite an achievement after we signed 3 of them.

      In the end it looks like we’ll finish 2nd in the league with more points than the Scudetto season so all round we can say it was a success.

      I’ll give a pass for the Champions League especially since two of our group rivals are now in the semi-finals.

      1. The problem with CDK was the same as with Tonali before or Chukwueze this year: Late transfer.
        Pioli’s got a group of players he trusts and if you’re not in that group you hardly see any playing time.
        This year the management acted early, got guys like Pulisic and Loftus Cheek early and they worked all preseason with Pioli. Chukwueze arrived late and a bit out of shape – took him more than half a season to get on track.

  3. It’s hard to criticise last summer’s transfers or indeed Pioli if we finish 2nd in the league.

    Also with two of our group rivals in the semi-finals, the early Champions League exit is understandable.

    But fans cannot have it every way.

    They can’t:

    – swoon over the new trinkets that arrived last summer (who have won nothing yet with the club) for setting the world alight;

    AND

    – call for Pioli and actual verifiable Scudetto winners to be sacked and sold for some imagined failing.

    We win as a team and lose as a team.

  4. Pioli: I want Milinković-Savić

    Moncada: Best I can do is RLC. We’ll throw in Musah as well.

    Sums up our summer mercato.

    1. Pioli approved many of our current players and even personally contacted some of them. He also vetoed a transfer that could have happened (Singo, although looking at his current that might be a good idea that didn’t happen). Pioli also didn’t want a defensive midfielder and trusted Krunic to perform as the sole man in front of the defense, which is something that he has never done.
      Sergej Milinković-Savić went to the saudis, I don’t think we could have competed with them financially.
      Overall many things can be said about both Pioli and summer window. It has to be said that we should have brought less central midfielders (we got Reijnders, Loftus-Cheek and Musah and we already had Bennacer, Pobega and Krunic) and went for a quality defensive midfielder or at least a midfielder that can defend. We also mismanaged the striker situation but fortunetaly Jovic turned out to be ok. And finally I think Luka Romero’s purcahse was a bit premature, but I’ll wait.
      As far as Pioli is concerned, I admit that integrating 10 or so new players from the get-go is not the easiet thing to do. With that said, our new regulars (Pulisic, Loftus-Cheek and Reijnders) have performed well from game 1 and have participated in the preseason, so the problem of integration concerns actually the subs (Musah, Jovic, Okafor and Chukwueze). Pioli also went for 4-3-3 with inverted fullbacks early on that limited the contribution of our most important players (Leao, Theo and Calabria). He has also habit of over-relying on the same players until they get injured or miss games and then rotate half the team with players that barely had time together (the Monza game was a good example). His tactics have also been largely understood by opposition and it seems that our greatest foes don’t seem to have problems coming up with appropriate counter-measures our in our case, THE appropriate counter-measure that seems to shut us down each time we play against it (sit-back, tighten the defense and midfield, quick transition and counterrattacks). And finally, we could also blame him to failing to integrate homegrown players even when they show they could perform well (Gabbia, Simic,…).

  5. Can’t declare that this is the team you asked for and then hide under the oh these are not the players I wanted excuse. Especially with Gerry’s trigger finger.

      1. Yea it wasn’t clear how I wrote it. It was meant as a hypothetical not that Pioli has said these things. I’m just saying he can’t use that as an excuse given he’s said at the beginning of the season he has the players he wanted

        1. And the new regulars (Pulisic, RLC and Reijnders) were doing good from the get-go. The integration problem concerned mostly the subs.

          1. Yes, the subs just didn’t get enough time basically. It’s actually why I wouldn’t have minded saving the money on Chuk/Musah for either a starter DM or kept one of Saele/Messias to keep chemistry (or future signing..st?). They wouldn’t have needed the integration time as much.
            Also, and this is a big reason, we switched formation from 433 (where most of our players were bought for and which Pioli wanted to do) back to the 4231… without players suited for the pivot.
            So while Deers is doing ok for instance , he still wasn’t meant to be playing his current position..
            Imo though Pioli has done incredibly well to integrate so many players

  6. The only blame is Milan players wasted chances in front of the goal.

    Look at Roma. If Giroud can scored a sitter then it could be 1-1 or maybe 2-1 since we deserved a pinalty after Tammy handsball.

    Then against Sassuolo, it could be 4-3 if again Giroud didn’t missed a sitter.

    Sure there’s tactical error from Pioli like we lost from Inter. But again, when his tactics works well but the player doesn’t do their job. Like against Atalanta and Napoli where we scored two goals first but later conceeded three and two goals from them.

    Fully blaming Pioli is just ridiculous and against the spirit of football is a sport team where everyone shared the praised and blame.

Comments are closed

Serie A Standings

Live football scores . Current table, fixtures & results.