Home » CM: Milan still left with ‘a squad full of holes’ despite summer revolution – the reasons
tare allegri

CM: Milan still left with ‘a squad full of holes’ despite summer revolution – the reasons

Photo by Claudio Villa/AC Milan via Getty Images

AC Milan ended up being one of the most active clubs around Europe in the summer, but has their business fixed all the squad defects?

As Calciomercato.com write, Milan completed 37 market operations in total when adding new arrivals (10) to sales (27). It is a total revolution, accompanied by the arrival on the bench of a new coach in Massimiliano Allegri.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


At the conclusion of the summer transfer window, Milan appear profoundly changed compared to last year, with a largely positive balance between purchases and departures – to make up for the lost income from the Champions League – but with many unknowns too.

Less quality?

While Allegri’s numerical demands for a smaller squad have been met – with 20-21 outfield players plus three goalkeepers – the current and final total of 19 outfield players (currently 18, given Jashari’s unavailability for the next two to three months) can be considered sufficient.

However, some doubts are raised about the overall value of a squad that has lost three starters compared to a year ago (Malick Thiaw, Theo Hernandez and Tijjani Reijnders), has seen the overall quality of many replacements decline compared to those who have departed.

The report writes that the squad is now depleted or has few or no alternatives to the starters in some specific roles or positions.

Signings summer mercato 2025

Which system?

Leaving goalkeepers aside (and as a reminder, Mike Maignan wanted to go to Chelsea but was persuaded to stay) the rearguard has been constructed in such a way that, whether a three-man or four-man back line is used, there’s a sense of incompleteness.

Fikayo Tomori, Matteo Gabbia and Strahinja Pavlovic are the players who conceded 58 goals last season. A signing capable of raising the bar and leading the others would have been needed, but instead Koni De Winter arrived – a solid addition – but also David Odogu who is just 19.

Davide Bartesaghi, coming off an unhappy but formative experience with Milan Futuro in Serie C, could be a surprise solution at left centre-back as well as acting as Pervis Estupinan’s backup on the left flank.

Wide areas

The real sore point in the transfer/sales campaign is the issue of the flanks. In the much-discussed comments of sporting director Igli Tare, he refers to an ‘unexpected’ change in the playing system that has stunned the management and forced them to adjust their strategy.

He’s referring to the initial idea of ​​starting with a back four, which was later changed to a three-man defence at the coach’s suggestion due to a lack of viable full-back options. Davide Calabria, Kyle Walker, Alessandro Florenzi, Filippo Terracciano and even Alex Jimenez all left.

On the left, a big name like Theo Hernandez has been replaced with a player like Estupinan, whose individual qualities make him a different beast. Zachary Athekame is deemed not ready yet, and the option of a solution like Tomori or De Winter at full-back shows the shortcomings.

Allegri De Winter

Abundant midfield

Directly linked to the dilemmas of defensive positioning are the unknowns Allegri faces in midfield as well. One of the Livorno-born coach’s greatest abilities is his ability to recognise a player’s strengths and weaknesses.

If he’s come to the conclusion after his first few weeks in charge that the club has provided him with three potential registas (Modric, Ricci and Jashari), it’s unlikely he’ll see any dramatic changes over the course of the season.

The last-minute signing of Adrien Rabiot addresses the need for a midfielder who can bring physicality and goalscoring prowess that wasn’t there before. But this begs the question: who’s left out when everyone is fit and available?

Currently Fofana, Modric and Rabiot appear to be the favorites for a starting spot with Loftus-Cheek, Ricci and Jashari all ready to fight to overturn the hierarchy.

No number nine

Allegri had indicated one priority above all others and Tare himself had repeatedly reinforced the idea that a true penalty-area centre-forward was essential.

With the Vlahovic option vanishing, and even the last-minute swap deal with Roma’s Dovbyk fading away, the manager has no choice but to work with ingenuity and imagination. He could persist with the Leao experiment as a false number nine or try to bring back the best Gimenez.

Above all, will Allegri find a way to fit Nkunku in? The Frenchman was acquired for €38m plus bonuses, so one would think he has to start, even if Max does continue with a 3-5-2 system.

Will he be willing to return to the three-man attack, sacrificing one of Pulisic and Saelemaekers, or will the former Chelsea player, at least initially, simply be a reserve?

Tags AC Milan

10 Comments

  1. LOL they were shocked by the change in formation?

    Do these people speak to each other? Do they work on planning the squad? clearly no to these basic questions

    The squad is the worst built in recent memory and that is on the back of years of critiscism about the construction of the squad.
    It seems to me MOncada identifies players he thinks are good investments and convinces Furlani to buy them, with no consideration as to how they will function

    We want to play wingbacks and yet sold Theo/Jimenez/Musah
    We want to play 2 upfront, yet we got rid of all the strikers bar Santi

    We know have Jashari 38m, Ricci 25m, Nkunku 40m all expected to be backups, thats 100m

    Pulisic will prob end up on the bench in this formation.
    The defense is a disaster.

    What a complete mess

  2. Not only have they (once again) created a half a*s squad but the system Allegri forces is completely out of specs with this bunch.

    Modrić is no regista and never was, Pulišić and Leao are no attackers and Bartesaghi is no wingback.

    To play any sort of formation, we lack in defense, on the flanks and up front. That’s what they created with 165 millions spent.

    GK: Mike, Terraciano, Torriani
    CB: Gabbia, Tomori, Di Winter, Pavlo, Bartesaghi
    FB/WB: Estupinan, Athekame, ???, ???
    CM: Ricci, Modrić, Jashari, Rabiot, Fofana, RLC
    W: Leao, Pulišić, Nkunku, Saele
    ST: Gimenez, ???

    1. technically RB and ST would have finished the 4-3-3 squad

      shockingly enough, RWB who can operate ideally as LWB and a ST would have finished the 3-5-2 squad. only leaving quality CB like Balerdi, Lucumi and Alexsandro…

      so, no matter what formation we settle on, we still had to sign Dovbyk (since loan option was there) and a fullback were a must; yet we didn’t do anything

      1. 433? Who’s the DM? And don’t say Ricci, he’s a mezzala..and where’s his sub? Also, we haven’t played the 433 during the preseason nor the first two games of the season. When do we expect to play the formation?. On the fly…during the season? Again…no logic, no planning

  3. How do we practice matches with reserve players if there are not enough players? If we only play against Primavera/Futuro teams, can the game tactics develop rapidly?

  4. the reason is milans market strategy, they go after 3-4 guys and pick the best deal, when doing that they are left with whom ever is the most affordable of the group. this would work if you only need a few guys. But trying to do an entire team that way is like picking a bunch of random puzzle pieces and hoping they fit

  5. Total mess: no quality starting CB, no quality starting FB, throwing money on reserves CM, no AM, same 2 (only 2) wingers and an unsettled ST.
    Should renew Calabria, spend for Italian CB and LB, replace Loftus and Fofana with one DM, get another winger/AM and get a ST. I only rate KDW, Jashari, Ricci and Modric. Should consider Leoni, Coppola (and let loose Tomori and Pavlo), Del Prato or Zappa for RB, Ruggeri for LB, Caviglia, Fabian, Pellegrini and a ST

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us