Home » Tuttosport: Okafor and Colombo not enough – Milan still lacking a No.9
Noah Okafor

Tuttosport: Okafor and Colombo not enough – Milan still lacking a No.9

Despite the eight additions made in the summer transfer window and the several new forwards that have joined, AC Milan are still perceived to be light in the centre-forward role.

Tuttosport (via MilanNews) recall how Milan signed Christian Pulisic and Samuel Chukwueze for the right wing position and then also signed Noah Okafor for the false nine/left wing role.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


What that means is that a natural striker could be a valid alternative to Olivier Giroud has not yet arrived. At the moment, the first alternative to the Frenchman is Lorenzo Colombo, who however seems oriented towards going out on loan to get more playing time.

Colombo has been involved in the preseason friendlies but wants to be able to play continuously, withCagliari, Lecce and Genoa all keen on securing a loan deal. If he were to go, the management would have to sign a new striker.

It’s difficult to understand who the Rossoneri’s potential targets could be given that some have already vanished, such as the Alejo Veliz who moved to Tottenham in recent days.

In all likelihood, a similar profile would join, i.e. a quality young player who can grow behind Giroud. For now, Divock Origi still remains in the squad, but the Belgian is out of the plans of Stefano Pioli and Milan.

Tags AC Milan

24 Comments

  1. Why must milan be stuck with a broke owner who had to sell tonali to buy players despite the amount of money we made from competition prizes, why does Chelsea have to be the who gets the better American

    1. that’s why Chelsea is under investigation by UEFA for violating FFP and we’re operating in a profit, and the money we earned from last season, that money doesn’t come until next month in September, so that money can only be spent next summer, I don’t know about you, but I like it the way in which the leading people in the club operate

      1. Did ffp stop Chelsea from spending, ffp is only for the poor team who don’t have good owner and so you love it as we sold tonali to raise fund for transfer

    2. As I have said we need a striker and a striker and a striker, in case no one noticed we need a STRIKER!!!!,

      The €110m, spend the ensemble of midfielders are all well and good but without a STRIKER it may prove to be all in vain and if Pioli does not recognise this he should be shown the door.

      Do what needs to be done and get a STRIKER, one befitting our club, a real bomber, even Lakaku if need be or David or BETO or Sesko.

      Only goals win games ONLY GOALS, the striker position is the most important on the pitch and we only have Giroud and Colombo, we have Okafor and he will prove valuable (God willing), but it is not enough to challenge on 3 fronts.

      Osimen has shown that with a world class striker you can win the scudetto at ‘a canter’, despite not having strength in every position.

      So let’s not blind ourselves to the big issue we have and we need to address in NOW, forget everything else!!

      1. Harder said then done finding a striker in that mold and strikers are high profile. Even 31 year old Taremi is around 20-25 million. Management will likely find someone but it will be later on.

        I have always been fond of Lacazette as he has a killer eye for the goal, but doubt be will leave Lyon. But with our French players we could convince him.

    3. Dude , you cannot use all your income for transfer player. Even chelsea sell many of their player . You still need pay salary, renting stadium,cost for away. Life is not just about transfer player. There are many operation cost of club . Now tell me which italian club not selling their player and can buy player without selling player ?

      1. See what broke a** cardinale has done to you, do you think big club fans like Madrid, Chelsea, man city, man utd psg, e.t.c worry their self about operating cost, this is what teams like Valencia try to do, milan should have a rich owner otherwise we will never get back to our ucl glory days operating like atalanta and Dortmund

        1. You’re delusional. Many of those teams you named are likely not going to be in for a good financial future. Also Man Utd? Really dude? They have sucked for years.

          Also, Peter Lim is driving Valencia into the ground. Disaster owner. Sold us Musah, one of their few assets, for just 20 million.

    4. It’s not about being broke. The club needs to maintain balanced finances. And many teams sell to maintain that, including many German teams who do it routinely. Until we have our own stadium, we need to edge more into this reality.

      Do you realize this team was one of the few that was in the black and not the red in terms of revenues versus expenditures? And this off the back of the covid pandemic when stadiums were shut.

      They have done impressive work.

    1. if Origi, Messias and Lazetić were to be sold, don’t be surprised if Hugo Ekitike comes, PSG told him that he can look for a new club, they don’t count on him

  2. I don’t agree with this, we are fine in front with many combinations and many players now. We don’t always have to play classic no. 9 ( such as Ollie) which makes our play predictable, it would be interesting to see Pulisic(as a false 9)/ Okafor flanked by Chuku & Leao.
    If any more transfers should be made they should be for a quality central midfielder & quality centreback.

  3. Last year we had Giroud, Rebic, Origi, Ibrahimovic.
    This year Giroud, Okafor, Colombo, Origi must be fine.
    Next year buy 40 million striker….

    1. & last year we came 5th and did not have a €110 spend.

      We can not expect to win the scudetto or do well in the Champions League with our current forward line.

      Giroud can not leas the attack no way, Colombo is either not good enough or not ready yet, Okafor has a tendency to go out to the wings and is not a stone cold striker.

      If you think our forward line is good then you need to rethink your opinions as what we have us not good enough

      1. Money is already spent. It is pointless now to spend 5 – 10 million on new striker. Better option is to use next summer mercato money to buy 1 expensive young striker.

        1. No. We can’t risk not having a fit striker, missing out on the CL and losing revenues. If there is an opportunity to sign someone now, and Colombo leaves, we need to act now.

  4. I guess the management slowed down too much for new players rn . We lost Veliz for whatever reason they can think and Gonzalez and Kamada Thuram Aouar Ndicka. rn idk why they can sign LB RB CB ST CDM and we have targets but idk what they are doing rn and can’t just sign Dominguez Singo Estève promote Barteseghi or sign Valentin Barco Larsen from Celta Or Beljo from Augsburg or Gift Emmanuel Orban they need to speed things up because the crisis will happen if not have full power

    1. The summer transfer market isn’t even close to over. We have plenty of time but need to work on exits. Messias is having his medical tomorrow. There will be other opportunities.

  5. Remind me, why have we signed Okafor if we now need another striker? Was it to play on the left?

    We have four players for that one position – instead of throwing money at a fifth maybe we need to make the best with what we have this season.

    1. It’s clear we need a real no. 1 striker. It’s our next big “hole”.

      “It’s difficult to understand who the Rossoneri’s potential targets could be given that some have already vanished, such as the Alejo Veliz who moved to Tottenham in recent days.”

      ☝️We’re not making a big more for one this summer as most of our funds have gone towards a midfield rebuild. We’re nearly at the end of our incoming transfer market. Even with sales we won’t have enough to get what we really need in this position, but we may scratch together enough for a CB, our other current need, as sourcing a quality young CB is easier.

      “In all likelihood, a similar profile would join, i.e. a quality young player who can grow behind Giroud.”

      ☝️This would be repeating the mistake we same to make every summer, buying some kid for 10m and then disappearing him into the youth system. No, what we need is an experience profile for one year, so we can get through this season, and then spending almost everything (since the rest of the lineup is relatively settled, except maybe another CB, see above) on one top striker next summer. We will need 40-50m for this. So use the entire transfer kitty on a striker next year. So to get us through this season I would say hijack Roma’s deal for Duvan Zapata (valued at only 3m), who at 32 is not our long term solution, but would be a solid add to our striker rotation of Giroud and Okafor. Colombo can go out on loan. Then Giroud expires next summer, we get that top striker and then our rotation is 1. [new striker], 2. Okafor, 3. Zapata (if it’s a permanent deal)/Colombo.

  6. I mean we COULD wait and see what a healthy Origi can contribute. He came in injured and never really reached healthy form last season. It’s not the worst option…..

  7. Lacazette. 😉 doubt he will leave Lyon though, but he would be my dream signing. Guy often has double digit scoring seasons. He scored 31 last season. And he would fit right in with some of our players.

    And people need to stop saying Origi. He is a really bad player. He’s not the crutch player Liverpool used to count on that would come on as a sub and score important goals anymore. The guy can barely score anymore.

    Also, recognize management for balancing the budget, signing reinforcements and this team posting a net profit for the first time in nearly 17 years.

  8. Bench giroud then use him as supersub, I mean he is 37 ffs, too many wasting chances every single game. And use okafor as false 9. Otherwise in my opinon it will be wiser to stay use 4231, problem solve.

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us