Home » Moretto: Brugge resigned to losing Jashari for €35m – search for replacement begins
Ardon Jashari #30 of Club Brugge KV

Moretto: Brugge resigned to losing Jashari for €35m – search for replacement begins

Photo by Alex Bierens de Haan/Getty Images

AC Milan appear to be moving closer to the signing of Ardon Jashari with Club Brugge now looking at replacements, Matteo Moretto reports.

It appears to be a very busy day at Casa Milan as AC Milan are advancing on multiple fronts with regards to the midfield. Several sources have reported that Milan are now very close to sealing a deal worth €22m plus bonuses for Torino’s Samuele Ricci, but he is not the only ongoing negotiation.


Read SempreMilan ad-free and get access to exclusive news. Click here for a free trial!


In fact, MilanNews then went on to state that Milan have budgeted around €35m for the signing of Jashari (including add-ons), which they hope will be enough to get the Swiss to join the Italian in a new-look midfield.

Brugge seek Jashari’s replacement

Matteo Moretto spoke on Fabrizio Romano’s YouTube channel about the situation of Jashari and whether he too could make a big-money move to Milan.

“Brugge are already looking for a player who can replace Jashari. Brugge have already understood that Jashari will leave, they are open to letting him go for the right offer: I understand that it should be 35 million as a fixed base. Milan will try to get as close as possible,” he said (via MilanNews).

“Let’s see if the efforts of Milan, perhaps combined with the will of the player, even if the player has many other offers – be careful, he doesn’t only have Milan – will lead to the definitive closure of the deal. But Brugge are looking for a replacement for Jashari.”

Tags AC Milan Ardon Jashari

30 Comments

  1. If ricci costs 22 mil without bonuses, there’s no way that this guy is worth anything close to 35 mill. Forget it and move on

  2. If this team is getting ricci modric and xhaka, the rest of the midfield we have is enough and I really like lotus cheek as well, I know he was disappointing this season but the season before he was fantastic and if Allegri can get him back to that, he if better than spending 35-40 mil on this guy

  3. Brugge are one of the best run clubs going, they’ll have the replacement lined up for ages and they’ll sell that replacement for 50M in a season or two.

      1. Bruges fans living the dream. Developing young players to sell them at high value when they’re finally matured. È un esempio, vero?

        1. È un esempio di come operare nella realtà finanziaria del calcio. Nessuno vuole vendere i propri giocatori migliori.

      2. And your evidence for your claim is what? The €4.5 million profit in 2023-2024? RedBird haven’t taken any dividend payments. They’re not the Glazers. They’re millionaires, you’re not. To sell the club for a profit, they have to be successful so stop being a Ted and pushing false narratives.

        1. Surley selling Tonali, Kalulu and Reijnders has nothing to do with it and Gerry’s interview saying “they’re in for player’s ROI is also my delusion and never happened right?

          Each comment you prove how stup*d, limited and uneducated you are yet you keep on banging. And keep me out of your comments you miserable, depressed cuck.

          1. I don’t think it’s delusion, but I think you might be off on your misunderstanding.

            The interview you’re talking about has a long part of it dedicated to how the value in sports is IP (ie the brand) and the ‘ROI’ bit is either referring to the investor interview in 2024 where he’s talking about how business and sports align through ‘ROI on goal efficiency’ (just buzzwords, but basically saying you need a team that’s greater than the sum of its parts), or a 2023 interview where he’s talking about his job is to get returns for his investors (by growing the value of assets on Redbird’s books).

            Look, I think they’re doing a pretty poor job in many regards, especially the sporting planning side, over the last two years. But player sales are not making them money, because that money isn’t coming out of the club. The aim of those sales is to reinvest and find better value players… They’re failing at it, but it makes sense as a goal – many big teams in the world operate that way.

          2. Where does the money go from sales? It’s reinvested in the squad. Complaining about Tonali’s sale, when he went on to get banned for a year, proves you’re unhinged. The sale was a masterstroke and you would have been the first one crying had he stayed and then been banned because you’re a hypocrite. Reijnders was sold because we’re in debt. All Italian clubs sell their best players, it’s only been happening for 20 years. You remain a Ted. Keep you out of my comments? Thanks for confirming I get under your skin. I will continue to use Ted as an adjective until you stop posting. You’re a Ted, Ted.

          3. @Ubermor*n, Milan are ALLOWED to register loss of 60 millions even under FFP agreement, get that into your thick skull you illiterate tard. Keep on doing it, all you are proving is to be a worldclass clown and an uneducated mor*n who lacks basic understanding of business. A clown fitting to this RedBird circus. Class A ubermor*n.

          4. @R, I am talking about an interview and question about Tonali’s sale where Gerry stated, and I quote:

            “We don’t sell out of necessity, we sell out of opportunism. If we remain disciplined, there will always be counterparties on the market who will allow extraordinary returns for the players.”

            Put this together with Furlani’s latest statement “the way we are managed, we do not need to make sacrifices”, and it’s clear.

          5. Clubs are allowed to post losses but what kind of a Ted would ignore debts and keep spending recklessly, putting the club into more debt? That’s right, a Ted.

          6. I love how you’re so triggered, so consumed with rage that you keep records of something as trivial as the comments made by management of a football team! All the major Italian clubs have cashed in over the past 20 years on their best players, including Milan under Berlusconi
            (Shevchenko, Thiago Silva and Kaka’, among others, were sold for large profits). The only reason you make a point of complaining about RedBird doing it, the only reason you expect this ownership to play by a different set of rules is because you’re a Ted.

          7. Comparing Berlusconi era to RedBird? Really? Keep it up you are outdoing yourself, you don’t need anyone’s intervention here.

            It doesn’t really strike me, the insults you’re throwing out. What triggers me is your complete illiteracy about business world and economics. You tard will continue to bash your empty skull writing mor*nic pieces likes “Milan cannot spend because they only booked 4,5 mills of profit” and “they are selling and re-investing, that is not profiting”

            Do you even realize you are not making sense at all? Do you realize what kind of mor*nic and uterly d*mb statements you are making? Selling for higher value than buying IS PROFITING and it goes into the books even if it is re-invested. Geez man get your thick empty head out of your behind and realize for a second, you’re an id*ot with no knowledge of anything. Even your surrogate father Gerry would be ashamed of you.

    1. Milan ain’t brugge.

      Winning at most, winning trophies, big trophies is Milan’s DNA.
      Brugge might be okay developing and selling without having any other sporting goal in mind. But the way I see it using that as a metric for Milan would not be utmost.

      Besides there’s that pressure everyone always talks about Milan and the seria a that brugge and Jupiler lacks.

      1. That same pressures at Milan would be put on serie A players that would come to Milan.
        What does Ricci know about winning or pressure? From Empoli to Torino, to Milan.
        At least Brugge players get to play in the UCL.

          1. They knew nothing, but they won on the backs of players like Van Basten, Gulit, Rijkaard who also didn’t know anything about winning in serie A before they came over from the Holland league.
            There are good players and bad players. Doesn’t make much difference what league they came from.
            Shevchenko came from the Ukranian league and immediately was one of the best players in the league, if not the best.
            Some fans think that just because some players play on a relegation team or mid table team in serie A is better than a player who comes from the Belgium league.
            Jashiri was voted the best player in the Belgium league. He isn’t some random dude, from some obscure league.
            Many players from the Belgium league were and are great ik serie A.
            SMS, Osimhen, Koulibally, etc. Players that were the best in their positions in serie A. Even CDK has been ballin once he played for a coach that knew how to use him. Saelemaekers was immediate starter at Milan.

      2. winning being in Milan’s DNA doesnt magically make Milan earn more money and compete with EPL clubs for revenue

        how do you still not realise it? The gap is very big

        1. I have told you not to reply me until you get that your mental health defect fixed.

          So winning doesn’t increase the club brand and sponsorships and revenues right??

          I guess the big boys like pool and bayern and real.

          Heck even inter who try and keep their best players, or buy targeted signings with a good sporting plan in mind and go all out to win are doing it wrong.

          He talks about increasing revenues and the ability for the club to challenge EPL sides and yet keeps on piggybacking Redbird policies that are no where sporting oriented, or have managed well the sporting side of the club these 3 years running 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😒🙄

          Keep your love for Redbird and their policies and your mental issues away, far, far from me, likewise I would do too.

    2. Well said in your response to the Ted. The owners can be criticised for their incompetence, but to even suggest players sales are for profit, when the money is reinvested in the squad, as you pointed out, is of course ridiculous.

      1. Bravo, another one of you ubermor*nic takes. Even if the money is reinvested, books show profit from their sales. Keep it up with being a laughing stock but keep your helmet on.

    1. What is there to forget about TJ… He was average at best… Try and compare his attributes to Jashari and u will understand how he was our greatest problem last season… He played in d double pivot with little or no defensive contributions… He was a runner, couldn’t even make simple crisp passes ..TJ was just a runner and scores smash n grab goals to cover his shortcomings… I was happy to be rid of him anyways

      1. Reijnders was Milan greatest problem last season?
        OK. Sure. He was such a problem ManCity couldn’t wait to take your biggest problem off your hands, for a lot of money.

  4. Ricci will be great. And so were so many other Italian players. The last great Italian midfielder? Verratti maybe. Ricci? Who knows…

  5. “books show profit from their sales.”.

    Are you new? Yes, the books will show profits from players if they are sold for more than they were signed for. It’s called trade and commerce. What’s your point? That’s right, you don’t have one.

Comments are closed

Sign up for our newsletter
Follow us